Understand the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and its impact on businesses. Learn about GST rates, compliance requirements, and its role in simplifying taxation. Stay updated with the latest GST news and updates.
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains why retrospective GST cancellation alone should not result in ITC denial where buyers have complied with Sect...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT offers broader powers than the First Appellate Authority but faces challenges relating to pre-deposit, timelines, and digita...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that notifications under Sections 9 and 11 of the CGST Act cannot go beyond GST Council recommendations...
Goods and Services Tax : Explains when to issue a Tax Invoice or Bill of Supply under GST and how the correct document helps avoid ITC disputes, notices, a...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains that GSTAT can condone delay only within the statutory extension under the CGST Act, unlike CESTAT....
Goods and Services Tax : A PIB backgrounder explains how nine years of GST have expanded the taxpayer base, increased collections, and simplified India's i...
Goods and Services Tax : Haryana recorded the highest State GST revenue growth of 32% during the first quarter of FY 2026-27, outperforming all other state...
Goods and Services Tax : The representation requests extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persistent technical issues ...
Goods and Services Tax : A representation seeks extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persistent technical issues on th...
Goods and Services Tax : The Advocates Tax Bar Association has requested extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persiste...
Income Tax : ITAT held that GST refund is not taxable where the tax component was never claimed as expenditure and was recorded as a receivable...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that a single GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is without jurisdiction and imper...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that clubbing five assessment years in a single GST show cause notice is contrary to Section 73 of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay High Court held that a GST order based on a notice issued to a dissolved company is void, while allowing fresh proceedings ...
Goods and Services Tax : Chhattisgarh HC granted bail after finding no unimpeachable document proving the applicant owned the firm. Issues of involvement w...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has shifted the FY 2025-26 AATO amendment window to 1–31 July 2026 due to system upgrades. Tax officer review will take pla...
Goods and Services Tax : June 2026 gross GST collections reached Rs. 1.94 lakh crore, driven by higher domestic and import revenues, while net collections ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Government has fixed 31 July 2026 as the last date for filing GST Appellate Tribunal appeals and applications in specified old...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC clarified that proceedings validly initiated before a taxpayer's jurisdiction changes remain legally valid. The new jurisdict...
CA, CS, CMA : KSCAA has urged the Government to extend the GSTAT appeal filing deadline by three months, citing technical glitches, procedural a...
The court held that the extended 30 November deadline for September GST returns applies retrospectively from 01.07.2017, requiring authorities to process ITC claims filed within this period.
Court held that GST proceedings must be treated as closed when tax is paid before SCN and 15% penalty is deposited, leading to quashing of order against petitioner.
The Court held that a State Tax Officer’s suspension for delayed reporting was unjustified when an adverse report had already been submitted before the fraudulent ITC claim. The ruling clarifies that authorities must act on such reports and cannot shift responsibility to subordinate officers.
The Court held that cancellation of GST registration could not stand when the amended place of business was not considered. It directed re-inspection of the updated address and fresh adjudication of the show cause notice.
The Court held that a penalty under Section 129 was unsustainable where the e-way bill had been generated before the goods were detained. It ruled that no intention to evade tax could be inferred when the required document existed prior to interception.
The Court determined that the authority reserved judgment on the hearing date and delivered it later without notifying the petitioner. It held that such a procedure is unsupported by the GST Act. The case was remanded for a fresh, lawful decision.
The Court found the appellate order to be unreasoned and based on non-application of mind. It set aside the decision and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
The judgment highlights that GST penalties require proof of intent to evade tax; mere technical lapses, such as e-way bill expiry due to traffic restrictions, are insufficient.
The Court found that the dispute pertained solely to mandatory interest on delayed tax payment, leaving no scope for challenge. It dismissed the petition while allowing the taxpayer to request instalment payment.
The Court ordered respondent No. 4 to consider and decide the petitioner’s GST refund representation. No findings were made on merits, and all issues remain open.
