Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nishant Anilbhai Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nishant Anilbhai Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) The Ahmedabad ITAT granted relief to the assessee after holding that a mere typographical error in mentioning the employer’s TAN in the income-tax return cannot result in denial of genuine TDS credit when taxes were actually deducted and deposited with the department. The assessee had filed return within due date and fully discharged tax liability. However, while entering the employer’s TAN in the ITR, the correct TAN “PNES12481A” was mistakenly typed as “PENS12481A”. Due to this minor typing error, the system failed to grant TDS credit...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031