Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Priti Suresh Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Priti Suresh Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Presumptive Income Upheld; Technical Reopening Issues- JAO vs FAO- Kept Open Pending Supreme Court—ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition under 44AD

The Mumbai SMC Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeals for AYs 2020-21 to 2022-23, holding that receipts duly offered under the presumptive taxation scheme of section 44AD cannot be treated as unexplained money under section 69A, merely on the basis of a statement recorded during searchPlease become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

840-Day Appeal Delay Not Condoned; Blaming CA Not Sufficient Cause: ITAT Bangalore Educational Society Cannot Be Treated as Religious Trust Without Evidence: ITAT Bangalore Sec 270A Penalty: Immunity U/s 270AA Cannot Be Denied Without Hearing – ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Deletes Sec 69A Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained by Earlier Withdrawals Sec 68 Addition on Opening Loans Deleted; Interest & Salary Allowed – ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031