Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Priti Suresh Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Priti Suresh Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Presumptive Income Upheld; Technical Reopening Issues- JAO vs FAO- Kept Open Pending Supreme Court—ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition under 44AD The Mumbai SMC Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeals for AYs 2020-21 to 2022-23, holding that receipts duly offered under the presumptive taxation scheme of section 44AD cannot be treated as unexplained money under section 69A, merely on the basis of a statement recorded during search. The assessee, a small labour contractor, had declared gross receipts of ₹4.78 lakh and offered ₹1.25 lakh ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031