ITAT Mumbai

Shares held as stock-in-trade do not attract dis allowance u/s 14A

ACIT Vs. M/s Safe Enterprises (ITAT Mumbai)

No dis allowance u/s 14A is called for in a case where the shares are held as stock-in-trade as held in India Advantage Securities Ltd. (supra), CCI Ltd. v. JCIT (2012) 20 196 (Karn.), PCIT v. State Bank of Patiala (2017) 78 3 (P& H) and CIT v. G.K.K. Capital Markets (P.) Ltd. (2017) 78 341 (Cal.)....

Read More

Section 54F: Jointly owned house will not be considered in house property calculation

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-5(2)(2) Vs. Shri Dawood Abdulhussain (ITAT Mumbai)

Word own in s. 54F would include only the case where a residential house is fully and wholly owned by assessee and consequently would not include a residential house owned by more than one person....

Read More

Non issue of notice U/s. 143(2) invalidates reassessment

A.M. Muthiah & Anr. Vs Dy. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)

A.M. Muthiah & Anr. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Issuance of notice under section 143(2) is mandatory, and absence thereof invalidates even a reassessment made in pursuance to section 148 and reliance placed by AO on section 292BB was misplaced. ...

Read More

Benefit Match Proceeds not Taxable: ITAT Relief to cricketer Sameer Dighe

The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shri Sameer Sudhakar Dighe (ITAT Mumbai)

This appeal by the Revenue is arising out of the order of Commissioner of Income Tax-30, Mumbai [in short CIT(A)], in appeal No. CIT(A)-30/AC19(3)/238/2014-15 dated 03-12-2015. The Assessment was framed by the Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax...

Read More

Provision for doubtful advances not allowable as Bad debts U/s. 36(1)(vii)

Elite International (P.) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

As we are dealing with admissibility of expenditure u/s 37 and not u/s 36(i)(vii) according to which, there must be an expenditure at the first instance which has crystallized during the impugned AY as against deduction u/s 36(i)(vii) which is allowable to the assessee the moment bad debt is written off in the books of accounts, notwithst...

Read More

Mere admission of estimated income made during survey has no evidentiary value

Shri Amod Shivlal Shah Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Shri Amod Shivlal Shah Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Assessments ought not to be based merely on the confession obtained at the time of search and seizure and survey operations, but should be based on the evidences/material gathered during the course of search/survey operations or thereafter, while framing the relevant assessments....

Read More

Deeming fiction U/s. 292BB not applicable on failure to issue notice U/s. 143(2) within specified period

Tiny Girl Clothing Company (P) Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner (Appeals)–21, Mumbai dated 28-3-2016 for the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee in its appeal raised several grounds of appeal both on validity of issue of service of notice under section 143(2)/148 of the Act as well on merits of the disallowances....

Read More

No penalty for Making of claim not sustainable in law unless mens rea established

Thane District Central Co.-Op. Bank Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Mere making of claim, which was not sustainable in law, by itself, did not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, unless mens rea was established, therefore, levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not justified....

Read More

No tax on TDR and transfer fees received by housing society from Members

ITO Vs M/s. Presidency Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)

This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) for the assessment year 2007-08. 2. The grievance of Revenue relates to deleting addition of Rs. 7,64,271 made by assessing officer on account of transfer fees and addition made on account of premium received by assessee from its members on utilization of T...

Read More

Addition U/s. 69A not sustainable if based on mere loose sheet found in third person premises

Riveria Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

These are appeals filed by the assessee directed against the order of Commissioner (Appeals)-13, Mumbai and order of the Commissioner (Appeals)-14, Mumbai dated 28-1-2016 for the assessment year 2006-07. Since facts are identical and issues are common, these appeals were heard together and are disposed of by this common order, for the sak...

Read More
Page 1 of 15512345...102030...Last »

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,649)
Company Law (3,702)
Custom Duty (6,853)
DGFT (3,607)
Excise Duty (4,105)
Fema / RBI (3,404)
Finance (3,621)
Income Tax (26,731)
SEBI (2,834)
Service Tax (3,326)