Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Late Chanchal Hiralal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Late Chanchal Hiralal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment notice invalid – Escaped income below ₹50 lakh & wrong sanctioning authority – Entire proceedings quashed – ITAT Mumbai In Late Chanchal Hiralal Shah vs ITO (A.Y. 2017-18), reassessment was initiated alleging difference between purchase consideration and stamp duty value of property, leading to proposed addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b). The assessee challenged validity of notice issued u/s 148 under the new regime on limitation and sanction grounds. The ITAT examined the provisions of sections 149 and 151 along with the Supreme...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031