Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manoj Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manoj Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The reassessment for AY 2018-19 treated purchases of ₹11.47 lakh from a suspected accommodation entry provider as bogus and disallowed them under section 37(1), since the transactions were found non-genuine though recorded in the books and paid through banking channels. Invoking section 263, the PCIT held the assessment to be erroneous and directed the AO to instead tax the amount as unexplained expenditure under section 69C and apply the higher tax rate under section 115BBE. The Tribunal held this revision to be without jurisdiction. It noted that section 69C...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mumbai ITAT Allows ESOP Deduction; Discounts on Employee Stock Options Are Not Contingent Liabilities Mumbai ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Wrong Approval U/s 151(ii); Penalties U/s 270A & 271AAC Also Deleted Section 10(10D): Should Life Insurance Exemption Cover Entire Maturity Proceeds or Only Income? Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031