Income Tax : A Comprehensive Analysis of Undisclosed Incomes under Sections 68 to 69D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, Taxation of these Incomes Un...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai rules unaccounted customer deposits, with traceable identities and commercial substance, are liabilities, not income ...
Income Tax : Overview of Income Tax Sections 69A, 69B, on unexplained income, investments, and expenditures. Key cases and interpretations incl...
Income Tax : The Sections by which the assessees are suffering too much due to high pitched assessments passed by NFAC are from 68 to 69D and 1...
Corporate Law : Assessees face 78% tax and 6% penalty for unexplained investments or expenditures under Sections 69 to 69C of Income Tax Act if de...
Income Tax : In the matter abovementioned Delhi HC dismissed appeal filed by revenue after observing that there is no allegation or finding tha...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune ruled for Yash Construction Co., holding that declared income during survey, if linked to business, cannot be taxed at h...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that addition by applying gross profit rate on alleged bogus purchases not justified since it was proved that...
Income Tax : The ITAT Pune ruled that additional income declared during a survey at Patel Shoes Co., consisting of excess stock, cash, and furn...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act on the basis of a third party statement without bringing an...
A Comprehensive Analysis of Undisclosed Incomes under Sections 68 to 69D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, Taxation of these Incomes Under Section 115BBE and Penalty Provisions under Sections 271AAC & 271AAD With Insights on Explained vs. Unexplained Income, Judicial Precedents & Finance Act, 2025 Amendments 1. Introduction & Legal Context. The robust and equitable functioning […]
In the matter abovementioned Delhi HC dismissed appeal filed by revenue after observing that there is no allegation or finding that cash had been received back by the assessee in respect of the purchases reflected in its books of account.
ITAT Pune ruled for Yash Construction Co., holding that declared income during survey, if linked to business, cannot be taxed at higher rates under Section 115BBE.
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition by applying gross profit rate on alleged bogus purchases not justified since it was proved that alleged purchases were made at par and were not under-valued or inflated. Thus, appeal of assessee allowed.
The ITAT Pune ruled that additional income declared during a survey at Patel Shoes Co., consisting of excess stock, cash, and furniture expenditure, is business income, not unexplained income under Sections 69/69C, overriding an initial misclassification.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act on the basis of a third party statement without bringing any corroborative material is liable to be deleted. Accordingly, addition deleted and appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Lucknow dismisses appeal by Raghav Agarwal (HUF) challenging reassessment and additions following settlement under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside CIT(A) order, sending back case of Tosifbhai Tajdin Halani to AO for fresh assessment on unexplained cash, gifts, and expenditure.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that weighted deduction under section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act rightly disallowed as donation is given to Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust who doesn’t have valid registration. Accordingly, appeal of assessee dismissed.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 69C of the Income Tax Act towards bogus purchases cannot be sustained merely for failure on the part of 3rd party in not responding to the summons. Addition set aside since genuineness of transaction proved.
