Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Analysis explains why Section 50C is a computation provision, discusses the First Proviso to Section 50C(1), and examines its stat...
Income Tax : Capital gains, business income, foreign assets, directorship and other transactions may make taxpayers ineligible to file ITR-1....
Income Tax : Know ITR due dates for FY 2025-26, belated and revised return deadlines, ITR-U timelines, late filing consequences and correspondi...
Income Tax : Learn how to report RSU and ESOP share sales for AY 2026-27, including capital gains, Schedule FA, Schedule CG, advance tax and di...
Income Tax : Know the eligibility, exclusions and key differences between ITR-1, ITR-2 and ITR-4 for AY 2026-27, including Section 139(9) and r...
Income Tax : A representation seeks activation of Form 68 filing for misreporting cases after the Finance Act, 2026 expanded immunity under Sec...
Income Tax : Net direct tax collections for FY 2026-27 grew by 14.64% as of June 17, 2026, driven by higher corporate and non-corporate tax rec...
Income Tax : The CBI apprehended an Income Tax Office Superintendent in Odisha after he was allegedly caught accepting a bribe for deleting a d...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has proposed a priority disposal mechanism for appeals filed up to and including 2022 in respons...
Income Tax : A representation has urged CBDT to merge TDS return codes 1023 and 1024, arguing that both apply to the same contract payments wit...
Income Tax : ITAT Panaji held BSNL VRS-2019 compensation is retrenchment compensation exempt under Section 10(10B), set aside CIT(A) orders, an...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune held BSNL VRS compensation exempt under Section 10(10B), condoned delay in filing appeals, and directed grant of refund ...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad condoned delay in filing appeal and allowed Section 10(10B) exemption claim for BSNL VRS compensation, making the a...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi deleted TP adjustments on export commission and model fee, allowed Section 80G claim principles, and granted relief on ...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of CSR expenditure under Section 37(1) does not prevent Section 80G deduction for eligible donat...
Income Tax : CBDT authorises DGIT (Systems) to upload AEOI information in Annual Information Statement Form 168 under section 239 and Rule 245(...
Income Tax : CBDT authorises DGIT (Systems) to upload AEOI information in AIS Form 26AS under sections 119, 90 and 90A, prescribing timelines a...
Income Tax : CBDT Circular 05/2026 clarifies safe harbour rules for foreign companies selling raw diamonds in Special Notified Zones, covering ...
Income Tax : CBDT Notification 74/2026 exempts TDS on eligible IFSC aircraft lease rent under section 393, subject to Form 1(N), effective from...
Income Tax : CBDT notifies NCCL's Core Settlement Guarantee Fund under Section 11 and Schedule III of the Income-tax Act, 2025, subject to spec...
The ITAT Ahmedabad held that royalty payments should continue to be benchmarked under TNMM by following earlier decisions in the assessees own case. It found no reason to replace TNMM with CUP where identical facts had already been decided. The Department’s transfer pricing challenge was therefore dismissed.
ITAT upheld taxation of IPS and CEV subsidies following the Section 2(24) amendment, while partly allowing the appeal on other issues.
SC issued notice after the High Court quashed the faceless assessment for non-compliance with the mandatory procedure under Section 144B.
SC upheld the finding of Section 144B violation but remanded the matter for a fresh assessment after following due procedure.
Bombay High Court held the assessment was non est as no mandatory draft assessment order was issued under Section 144B.
The Allahabad High Court held that additional evidence cannot be admitted by the CIT(A) without recording reasons and giving the Assessing Officer an opportunity to rebut it. It upheld the Tribunal’s decision to remand the matter for fresh consideration under Rule 46A.
The Delhi High Court held that the issues raised by the Revenue were either covered by binding precedents or based on factual findings of the ITAT. It dismissed the appeal after finding no substantial question of law for consideration.
The ITAT Mumbai held that the rejection of the assessees certified segmental results was unsupported by cogent material and based on surmises. It directed the TPO to consider the audited segmental accounts while benchmarking the international transaction.
The Karnataka High Court held that where the Revenue had consistently accepted the same interest rate in earlier and subsequent assessment years, it could not adopt a different approach for a single year without justification. The appeal challenging the ITAT’s order was dismissed.
Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Because Mandatory Section 144B Procedure Was Not Followed
