Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Star Jewels Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Star Jewels Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition – Cash Deposits from Recorded Jewellery Sales Cannot Be Taxed under Section 69A on Mere Suspicion The ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition made under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of cash deposits made during the demonetisation period, holding that the deposits were supported by recorded cash sales and regular books of account. The assessee, a retail jewellery partnership firm, explained that the cash deposits arose from cash sales and available cash balance, supported b...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Technical Glitch in Form 26A Filing Cannot Trigger Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance: ITAT Bangalore Form 26AS Alone Cannot Decide Taxability of FD Interest: ITAT Bangalore Entire Bogus Purchases Not Taxable If Sales Accepted; Only Profit Taxable: ITAT Bangalore Bangalore ITAT Reaffirms that Transfer Pricing Adjustment Must Be Restricted Only to International Transactions with AEs Reassessment Quashed as New Allegations Exceeded Section 148A Proceedings: Karnataka HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031