Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : The article explains how the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023 introduced one-third reservation for women i...
Corporate Law : The piece states that replacing Annamalai as Tamil Nadu BJP President disrupted the partys long-term growth strategy. It suggests ...
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court observed that criminal case delays are caused not only by judicial officers but also by inadequate infras...
Corporate Law : LMPC Compliance regulates packaging, labeling, and sale of packaged commodities under the Legal Metrology framework in India. Busi...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court quashed a POCSO FIR after noting that the relationship was consensual and the parties were married with a chi...
Corporate Law : The Union Cabinet approved ECLGS 5.0 to provide guaranteed emergency credit support to MSMEs, non-MSMEs, and airlines facing liqui...
Corporate Law : The notification prohibits manufacturers acting as GATCs from charging fees for verifying their own products. It also caps re-veri...
Corporate Law : The initiative addresses delays in disaster communication across regions. The system enables instant, geo-targeted alerts using mo...
Corporate Law : The issue concerned operationalising a ₹10,000 crore startup fund. It was established that routing investments through AIFs ensu...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that an Insurance Company cannot avoid liability without producing evidence showing absence of ...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court directed constitution of a special NCLT Bench after an insolvency petition remained pending despite being re...
Corporate Law : Gujarat High Court quashed tax orders after holding that three hearing dates cannot be treated as three adjournments under Section...
Corporate Law : Bail was granted in a spurious cancer drug case under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) as there was no clear link between...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that protections available under the MSMED Act and RBI revival framework do not bar initiation of CIRP once finan...
Corporate Law : PFRDA clarified that Pension Agents working with multiple Points of Presence must be identified through PAN for better traceabilit...
Corporate Law : PFRDA has expanded the NPS Sanchay incentive framework to include CSC-VLEs, BCs/Pension Sakhis, and PACS operating through PoPs. T...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
Corporate Law : PFRDA has introduced NPS Sanchay as a simplified National Pension System variant aimed at expanding pension coverage for India’s...
Corporate Law : The circular clarifies that SEBI regulations on insider trading, self-dealing, and front running will apply to all NPS investment ...
Explore the Delhi High Court verdict on the Chief Justice of India’s office under RTI Act. While notes, jottings, and draft judgements are exempt, concerns about transparency linger. Learn more about the implications and nuances.
Delhi HC rejects Supreme Court’s claim on CJI’s office being exempt from RTI, citing checks and balances. Upholding accountability, the verdict emphasizes well-defined standards for judicial independence.
To help special economic zones (SEZs) absorb global economic shocks, the government plans to allow them to make available their excess installed capacities for the use of industrial consumers in the domestic tariff area (DTA). The idea is to ensure that industrial capacities built up in SEZs don’t remain idle in case another global slowdown occurs and dry up export demand. Of course, such contract manufacturing by SEZs would be bereft of any tax relief.
Every individual or nominee of a body corporate who is intending to be appointed as designated partner of a limited liability partnership shall submit an application electronically to the Central Government for allotment of Designated Partner Identification Number ( DPIN) in the manner as provided in Form 7 along with fee as mentioned in Annexure ‘A’.
In a ruling that is bound to have ramifications, specially on big tax-payers , and in a move aimed at curbing tax evasion, the Central Information Commission has ruled that seeking information on income tax is not invasion of privacy. Ruling out that disclosure of information would lead to unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual
After politicians and judges of the Supreme Court, now the assets of babus have also been prised open to public scrutiny by RTI. In a landmark order, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has said that disclosure of information such as assets of a public servant, routinely collected by the public authority,
The commerce ministry has proposed measures to make it easier for developers to exit special economic zones (SEZs) that have been struggling with a contraction in global demand for goods produced at the tax-free enclaves. Specific provisions for the de-notification of SEZs have been been put up for public comments till Thursday, after which they would be formally notified.
A public prosecutor representing the state in criminal cases need not divulge details of the legal opinion given to the government as it is privileged communication, the Madras High Court has ruled. In a similar case Supreme Court said that a judge could not be asked under the Right to Information (RTI) Act as to how and why he came to a particular conclusion in a judgment.
Can a judge be asked under the Right to Information (RTI) Act as to why and how he came to a particular conclusion in a judgment? No, says the Supreme Court. The apex court saw the mischief potential of queries under the RTI Act in relation to a judge and his judgments and a Bench comprising Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justice B S Chauhan firmly said that a judge speaks through his judgments and he could not be made to answer questions relating to his verdict in a case.
It has been made clear that such information cannot be sought directly from the private business groups but from a government department which holds it.
