This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sri. Soger Malleshappa Manjunath Kanasoger Mane Mugulikoppa Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-2018
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sri. Soger Malleshappa Manjunath Kanasoger Mane Mugulikoppa Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Bangalore)
Demonetisation Sales Can’t Become “Bogus” Just Because SBNs Were Accepted- ITAT Bangalore Deletes ₹29.27 Lakh Addition!
The Bangalore ITAT deleted an addition of ₹29.27 lakh made u/s 68 during the demonetisation period, holding that once the assessee had properly recorded the cash sales in audited books, VAT returns, stock registers and cash book, the same could not be treated as unexplained cash credit merely because the sales proceeds were received in Specified Bank Notes ...




