Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Opinion article criticises the Ayodhya Bar resolution refusing to defend accused, citing constitutional protections, Bar Council r...
Corporate Law : Learn when a Board Meeting is mandatory and when a Circular Resolution can be used under the Companies Act, 2013. Explore the comp...
Corporate Law : Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Rules, 2026 introduce key changes to FCRA compliance, including key functionaries, Sta...
Corporate Law : The article explains ghost assets, their financial and audit impact, CARO 2020 requirements, and the importance of periodic physic...
Corporate Law : Explains climate litigation, judicial doctrines, global trends, key arguments, critiques, and its role alongside legislation and g...
Corporate Law : PIB outlines Indias E20 ethanol blending progress, programme milestones, industry views, and responses to frequently raised concer...
Corporate Law : NSE FAQs explain Regulation 42 Record Date filing, NEAPS submission, timelines, rights issue requirements and compliance under SEB...
Corporate Law : The Government has extended two additional NPS investment options to Central Autonomous Bodies employees, enabling pension plannin...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The Government clarified that the Supreme Court was informed only about proposed Transfer Petitions to consolidate ethanol allocat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Chandigarh dismissed homebuyers’ plea, upheld the RP’s claim admission methodology, and declined re-computation of intere...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai rejected a Section 7 IBC plea, holding that the DRT review order only corrected errors and did not extend limitation....
Corporate Law : Kerala HC quashed a composite GST show cause notice covering 2019-20 to 2023-24 and allowed issuance of separate notices for each ...
Corporate Law : NCLT Delhi dismissed a perjury application, holding no exceptional case existed as the Section 9 petition was decided after consid...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Chennai dismissed the appeal, upholding leave under Section 33(5) IBC to challenge agreement termination before the Civil Co...
Corporate Law : IRDAI has revised financial result formats for listed insurers adopting Ind AS to meet SEBI LODR disclosure requirements, effectiv...
Corporate Law : IBBI extends the deadline for filing PGIRP-1 to PGIRP-6 forms to 30 September 2026 and defers penalties while directing accurate e...
Corporate Law : PFRDA expands NPS investment options for CAB subscribers by adding two Auto Choice schemes through Circular No. PFRDA/2026/39 date...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspended an Insolvency Professional for three years over wrongful rejection of an admitted CIRP claim and non-compliance wit...
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
The Madras High Court held that courts are empowered under Section 73 of the Evidence Act to compare disputed and admitted signatures without necessarily requiring expert evidence. It restored the Trial Courts decree after finding the comparison legally valid.
The Madras High Court held that although execution of the promissory note was admitted, the plaintiff failed to prove that consideration had actually passed. It confirmed dismissal of the money recovery suit.
The Allahabad High Court held that a bona fide typographical error in the date of birth could be corrected since it did not confer any eligibility advantage. It quashed the rejection order and directed the authorities to conduct the petitioner’s detailed medical examination.
The Supreme Court held that disputed monetary claims arising from a construction contract could not be decided in writ proceedings. It ruled that such disputes must be resolved through the agreed arbitration mechanism.
The Supreme Court held that cancellation of a public tender was arbitrary because it was driven by ministerial directions without proper application of mind. It restored the successful bidder’s contractual rights and set aside the High Court’s decision.
The Supreme Court held that High Courts should ordinarily refrain from entertaining writ petitions in SARFAESI matters where an effective statutory remedy before the DRT exists. The ruling reiterates the limited scope of Article 226 in commercial recovery disputes.
The Jharkhand High Court held that a marriage marked by 36 years of separation had become a “dead wood marriage,” justifying dissolution. It also enhanced the wife’s permanent alimony from ₹10 lakh to ₹40 lakh.
The Supreme Court held that a mortgage redemption suit filed before expiry of the agreed mortgage term must fail. It set aside the remand order and restored the dismissal of the suit as premature.
The article explains that a partnership comprising only two partners stands dissolved on the death of one partner under the Partnership Act. It also outlines the tax and compliance implications of carrying on the business until a new firm is constituted.
The NCLT held that an investment made under a film production and revenue-sharing agreement did not constitute an Operational Debt. As no goods or services were provided, the Section 9 IBC petition was dismissed as not maintainable.
