This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Suppliers Ignoring Section 133(6) Notices Alone Can’t Make Purchases Bogus: ITAT Gives Fresh Lifeline to Liquor Trader
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ramakant Bhuvan Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2022-23
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ramakant Bhuvan Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Suppliers Ignoring Section 133(6) Notices Alone Can’t Make Purchases Bogus: ITAT Gives Fresh Lifeline to Liquor Trader
The Pune ITAT held that merely because suppliers failed to respond to notices issued under section 133(6), the entire purchases cannot automatically be treated as bogus when the assessee possesses substantial documentary evidence proving the transactions.
In the case of Ramakant Bhuvan, a liquor trader, the AO had added ₹3.68 crore as inflated purchases under section 37(1) solely because five out of six liquor suppliers d...
Author Info
