Income Tax : The issue is when High Courts can entertain appeals against ITAT orders. The key takeaway is that only debatable, material legal q...
Income Tax : Supreme Court disallows ₹10 crore bad debt deduction for Khyati Realtors Pvt Ltd, ruling it as capital expenditure, not eligible...
Income Tax : Explore remedies for taxpayers under the Income Tax Act, 1961, comparing appeals & revisions. Understand procedures, limitations &...
Income Tax : On commencement of regular assessment proceedings u/s 143(2) of Act , there is no need for intimation u/s 143(1)(a)(i) Where the s...
Income Tax : Substantial question of Law (SQL). On interpretation of section 260A of the Income Tax Act , 1961 and section 100 of the code of c...
Income Tax : Madras High Court held that time-share membership fees could not be fully taxed in the year of receipt since the assessee had cont...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled in favour of the assessee after noting that audited financials, PAN, bank statements, ITRs, confirmations, and ...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that only the actual period lost during the limitation period can be excluded under Explanation-1 to Secti...
Income Tax : The High Court ruled that reopening under Sections 147 and 148 was unsustainable because the Assessing Officer’s reasons amounte...
Income Tax : The Delhi High Court held that shareholders of a foreign company cannot be taxed on the company’s rental income and capital gain...
DGFT : All conditions in policy circular no 15 of 1st February 2011 will continue to apply, except the specification about dates and the ...
Gujarat High Court rules belated filing of Form 10B before processing is sufficient, overturning ITAT, allows Section 11 exemption for trust.
Calcutta High Court held that addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards bogus share capital and share premium duly deleted by CIT(A) since identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers alongwith genuineness of transactions duly proved.
Karnataka High Court allows Ingersoll-Rand’s tax appeals, clarifying rules on club fees, ad-hoc disallowances, and 80HHC deduction for service income.
Gauhati High Court held that in view of provisions of section 292B and 292BB of the Income Tax Act the right of assessee has been restricted to challenge the validity of notice issued by Income Tax Officer (ITO) or assessment order passed by DCIT.
Delhi High Court held that issuance of notice for initiating penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act without specifying the limb under which the penalty was proposed to be levied is bad-in-law. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
Delhi High Court rejects Revenue appeal against Punjab & Sind Bank on securities, pension, 14A issues, citing coverage by earlier court judgments.
Thus, a substantial portion of the cause of action has accrued at Kolkata. Applying the principle of forum convenience, it would be appropriate if the petitioner was relegated to availing of the remedies at Kolkata.
Bombay High Court held that as per the terms and conditions of the agreement, the assessee was required to pay 5% of the receipt of the assessee and not on 5% of the gross advertising bills. Accordingly, infrastructure fee deduction restricted to 5% of receipt.
Bombay High Court confirms private trust assessable as Association of Persons, upholding disallowance of interest paid to beneficiaries under Section 40(ba).
Delhi High Court dismisses revenue appeal against Bharti Airtel, reaffirming that charges paid for bandwidth to overseas operators are not taxable as royalty under the Income Tax Act.
