Income Tax : The issue is when High Courts can entertain appeals against ITAT orders. The key takeaway is that only debatable, material legal q...
Income Tax : Supreme Court disallows ₹10 crore bad debt deduction for Khyati Realtors Pvt Ltd, ruling it as capital expenditure, not eligible...
Income Tax : Explore remedies for taxpayers under the Income Tax Act, 1961, comparing appeals & revisions. Understand procedures, limitations &...
Income Tax : On commencement of regular assessment proceedings u/s 143(2) of Act , there is no need for intimation u/s 143(1)(a)(i) Where the s...
Income Tax : Substantial question of Law (SQL). On interpretation of section 260A of the Income Tax Act , 1961 and section 100 of the code of c...
Income Tax : Calcutta HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal after the remand report confirmed the disputed receipt was sale proceeds of investments...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court ruled that expenditure cannot be disallowed under Section 14A unless exempt income is actually earned in the rele...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that non-compliance with Section 144B raised a jurisdictional issue requiring ITAT adjudication and set asi...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court upheld deletion of the Section 271D penalty, holding that absence of recorded satisfaction in the assessment or...
Income Tax : The High Court declined to examine bogus purchase issues after holding the Revenue's appeal not maintainable due to low tax effect...
DGFT : All conditions in policy circular no 15 of 1st February 2011 will continue to apply, except the specification about dates and the ...
Calcutta High Court upholds ITAT decision, dismissing Income Tax Department’s appeal regarding share capital and premium addition for AY 2012-13.
Telangana High Court held that granting registration under section 12A retrospectively is not permissible as cogent reasons not provided for belated filing of application for registration under section 12A. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
The Tribunal therefore, has rightly affirmed the conclusion arrived at by CIT(Appeals) in deleting the tax demand relatable to difference between 20% and the actual tax rate on which tax was deducted by the respondent assessee in terms of the relevant DTAAS.
Delhi High Court addresses Fujitsu India’s transfer pricing appeal, validating ‘headcount’ for expense allocation and remanding comparable selection for re-evaluation.
Madras High Court held that ITAT rightly deleted the addition on account of Mutual Fund Promotion Expenditure and Initial Public Offer Expenditure since the said expenses are incurred wholly for the purpose of business and hence the same are allowable expense.
PCIT (Central)-2 Vs K.R. Pulp And Papers Ltd (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act rightly quashed by CIT(A) and ITAT since there was full and true disclosure of all the material facts on the part of the assessee. Accordingly, appeal of revenue […]
Madras High Court held that pledging of shares for the enable sister concern to avail loan is certainly an activity undertaken in the course of business. Accordingly, sale of shares thereon to satisfy dues of defaulting sister company is entitled for deduction of business loss/ debt.
Bombay High Court rules that interest subsidies received by banks from the RBI under the Export Credit Scheme are not taxable as ‘interest’ under Section 4 of the Interest Tax Act, 1974.
Madras High Court dismisses Revenue’s appeal, ruling that a delay in filing Form 56F cannot deny Income Tax deduction under Section 10AA if the claim was made in the original return.
Delhi High Court held that the benefit of exclusion of time by virtue of Explanation (ix) of Section 153B of the Income Tax Act cannot be available here as reference made for information under Indo-Swiss DTAA was invalid. Accordingly, questions to law as framed are answered against the Revenue.
