Follow Us:

section 260A

Latest Articles


Why High Courts Cannot Revisit Facts Under Income Tax Section 260A

Income Tax : The issue is when High Courts can entertain appeals against ITAT orders. The key takeaway is that only debatable, material legal q...

January 9, 2026 1143 Views 0 comment Print

SC Disallows Bad Debt Deduction for Khyati Realtors Pvt Ltd

Income Tax : Supreme Court disallows ₹10 crore bad debt deduction for Khyati Realtors Pvt Ltd, ruling it as capital expenditure, not eligible...

October 23, 2024 8598 Views 0 comment Print

Assessing Remedies: A Comparative Analysis of Appeals and Revisions for Taxpayers Under Income Tax Act, 1961

Income Tax : Explore remedies for taxpayers under the Income Tax Act, 1961, comparing appeals & revisions. Understand procedures, limitations &...

March 19, 2024 10143 Views 0 comment Print

Section 143(1)(a)(i) intimation not required on commencement of regular Section 143(2) assessment

Income Tax : On commencement of regular assessment proceedings u/s 143(2) of Act , there is no need for intimation u/s 143(1)(a)(i) Where the s...

July 24, 2021 5622 Views 0 comment Print

Substantial Question of Law under section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961

Income Tax : Substantial question of Law (SQL). On interpretation of section 260A of the Income Tax Act , 1961 and section 100 of the code of c...

July 21, 2021 12780 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Madras HC Upholds Deferred Taxation of Time-Share Fees as Obligations Continued Over Membership Period

Income Tax : Madras High Court held that time-share membership fees could not be fully taxed in the year of receipt since the assessee had cont...

May 19, 2026 123 Views 0 comment Print

Loans via Banking Channels not Bogus Merely on ‘Shell Company’ Allegation

Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled in favour of the assessee after noting that audited financials, PAN, bank statements, ITRs, confirmations, and ...

May 18, 2026 237 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Quashes ₹287 Crore Addition- Third Party Excel Sheets Alone Not Enough

Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that only the actual period lost during the limitation period can be excluded under Explanation-1 to Secti...

May 18, 2026 471 Views 0 comment Print

Reassessment Invalid as AO Had Only ‘Reason to Suspect’ and Not ‘Reason to Believe’ in Bogus LTCG Case

Income Tax : The High Court ruled that reopening under Sections 147 and 148 was unsustainable because the Assessing Officer’s reasons amounte...

May 14, 2026 408 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi HC to Tax Department: 100% Shareholding Doesn’t Make You Owner of Company’s Property

Income Tax : The Delhi High Court held that shareholders of a foreign company cannot be taxed on the company’s rental income and capital gain...

May 12, 2026 309 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Notifications


Allocation of quantities of cotton yarn for export in terms of Policy Circular No.17 dated 10th February 2011

DGFT : All conditions in policy circular no 15 of 1st February 2011 will continue to apply, except the specification about dates and the ...

March 10, 2011 478 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Posts in section 260A

Madras HC Upholds Deferred Taxation of Time-Share Fees as Obligations Continued Over Membership Period

May 19, 2026 123 Views 0 comment Print

Madras High Court held that time-share membership fees could not be fully taxed in the year of receipt since the assessee had continuing obligations extending over several years. The Court approved spreading part of the income over the membership tenure.

Loans via Banking Channels not Bogus Merely on ‘Shell Company’ Allegation

May 18, 2026 237 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal ruled in favour of the assessee after noting that audited financials, PAN, bank statements, ITRs, confirmations, and MCA records of lenders were furnished. The ruling reinforces that documentary evidence can successfully rebut allegations of bogus loans.

ITAT Quashes ₹287 Crore Addition- Third Party Excel Sheets Alone Not Enough

May 18, 2026 471 Views 0 comment Print

The Hyderabad ITAT held that only the actual period lost during the limitation period can be excluded under Explanation-1 to Section 153. It ruled that the assessment order passed beyond the permissible period was invalid.

Reassessment Invalid as AO Had Only ‘Reason to Suspect’ and Not ‘Reason to Believe’ in Bogus LTCG Case

May 14, 2026 408 Views 0 comment Print

The High Court ruled that reopening under Sections 147 and 148 was unsustainable because the Assessing Officer’s reasons amounted only to suspicion and not a valid reason to believe income had escaped assessment.

Delhi HC to Tax Department: 100% Shareholding Doesn’t Make You Owner of Company’s Property

May 12, 2026 309 Views 0 comment Print

The Delhi High Court held that shareholders of a foreign company cannot be taxed on the company’s rental income and capital gains merely because they hold all its shares. The Court reiterated that a company is a separate legal entity unless fraud or sham arrangements are proved.

Telangana HC Condones 2913-Day Delay as Notices Were Sent to Wrong Address

May 9, 2026 228 Views 0 comment Print

The Telangana High Court restored an income tax appeal after finding that notices were not sent to the consultant’s address mentioned in the appeal memo. The Court condoned a delay of 2913 days subject to payment of Rs. 50,000 as costs.

Section 69B Addition Confirmed as AO Recorded Discrepancies Before DVO Reference

May 8, 2026 183 Views 0 comment Print

Madras High Court held that a reference to the District Valuation Officer was valid because the Assessing Officer had effectively rejected the books of accounts after recording discrepancies. The Court upheld the Section 69B addition for unexplained investment in building construction.

Section 263 Revision Invalid as AO Already Examined Accumulated Fund Utilization: Bombay HC

May 8, 2026 222 Views 0 comment Print

Bombay High Court held that revisionary powers under Section 263 cannot be invoked where the Assessing Officer had already conducted enquiries and accepted a plausible view. Mere dissatisfaction with the depth of enquiry does not render the assessment order erroneous.

Entire Bogus Purchase Amount Cannot Be Taxed Without Considering Profit Element: Gujarat HC

May 7, 2026 414 Views 0 comment Print

The Gujarat High Court upheld the ITAT order restricting disallowance on alleged bogus purchases to 6% instead of 100%. The Court held that only the income component embedded in disputed transactions could be taxed.

Gujarat High Court Upholds 6% Addition on Bogus Purchases as Only Profit Element Taxable

May 7, 2026 135 Views 0 comment Print

The Gujarat High Court held that only the income component embedded in alleged bogus purchases could be taxed instead of the entire purchase amount. The Court upheld the ITAT order restricting disallowance to 6% of disputed purchases linked to accommodation entries.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031