Income Tax : The issue is when High Courts can entertain appeals against ITAT orders. The key takeaway is that only debatable, material legal q...
Income Tax : Supreme Court disallows ₹10 crore bad debt deduction for Khyati Realtors Pvt Ltd, ruling it as capital expenditure, not eligible...
Income Tax : Explore remedies for taxpayers under the Income Tax Act, 1961, comparing appeals & revisions. Understand procedures, limitations &...
Income Tax : On commencement of regular assessment proceedings u/s 143(2) of Act , there is no need for intimation u/s 143(1)(a)(i) Where the s...
Income Tax : Substantial question of Law (SQL). On interpretation of section 260A of the Income Tax Act , 1961 and section 100 of the code of c...
Income Tax : Calcutta HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal after the remand report confirmed the disputed receipt was sale proceeds of investments...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court ruled that expenditure cannot be disallowed under Section 14A unless exempt income is actually earned in the rele...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that non-compliance with Section 144B raised a jurisdictional issue requiring ITAT adjudication and set asi...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court upheld deletion of the Section 271D penalty, holding that absence of recorded satisfaction in the assessment or...
Income Tax : The High Court declined to examine bogus purchase issues after holding the Revenue's appeal not maintainable due to low tax effect...
DGFT : All conditions in policy circular no 15 of 1st February 2011 will continue to apply, except the specification about dates and the ...
Chhattisgarh High Court voids Section 263 revision order against Shilphy Steels, ruling it invalid due to lack of reasonable hearing opportunity for the assessee.
ITAT Delhi held that the seat of Tribunal and/or jurisdiction of concerned Hon’ble High Court would depend upon where seat of the Assessing Officer who has passed the assessment order. Thus, ITAT Delhi Bench do not have territorial jurisdiction as assessment order are based by AO in Lucknow.
Assessee – real estate developer was engaged in the business of construction of residential units / bungalows which were duplexes surrounded by a compound wall. Each residential unit consisted of a portico and an open terrace.
Calcutta High Court upholds income estimated at 0.77% for GNG Exports after books rejection, even with initial grounds for rejection found untenable.
ITAT Kolkata held that compensation received for failure of performance guarantee parameter of capital assets [Wind Turbine Generators] is in nature of capital receipt and hence outside the purview of taxation. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
Delhi High Court held that that Section 68 of the Act as was in force prior to 01.04.2023, did not require the assessee to explain the source of the source of funds in case of unsecured loans. Accordingly, addition is liable to be deleted and appeal allowed.
The Supreme Court clarifies that the six-year tax assessment period for third parties, whose documents are seized, starts from the date their AO receives materials, not the original search date.
Calcutta High Court dismisses Income Tax Department’s appeal regarding unexplained cash credit from share capital, citing a previous binding decision.
Delhi High Court held that valuation of unquoted equity shares held by the assessee by Discounted Cash Flow [DCF] method is permissible under rule 11UA(2) of the Income Tax Rules. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
Calcutta High Court affirms ITAT’s deletion of unexplained cash deposit addition during demonetization, citing AO’s failure to submit remand report and lack of rebuttal.
