Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Notice proposing penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) without specifying limb is bad-in-law

Case Law Details

Case Name
PCIT-7 Vs Quippo Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2010-11
Advertisement
PCIT-7 Vs Quippo Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court held that issuance of notice for initiating penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act without specifying the limb under which the penalty was proposed to be levied is bad-in-law. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed. Facts- AO disallowed the Assessee’s claim for expenditure of ₹2,50,00,000/- for availing professional services and further disallowed a sum of ₹223,03,31,321/- on account of interest claimed by the Assessee u/s. 36(1)(iii) of the Act and assessed the total income...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *