Income Tax : The issue is when High Courts can entertain appeals against ITAT orders. The key takeaway is that only debatable, material legal q...
Income Tax : Supreme Court disallows ₹10 crore bad debt deduction for Khyati Realtors Pvt Ltd, ruling it as capital expenditure, not eligible...
Income Tax : Explore remedies for taxpayers under the Income Tax Act, 1961, comparing appeals & revisions. Understand procedures, limitations &...
Income Tax : On commencement of regular assessment proceedings u/s 143(2) of Act , there is no need for intimation u/s 143(1)(a)(i) Where the s...
Income Tax : Substantial question of Law (SQL). On interpretation of section 260A of the Income Tax Act , 1961 and section 100 of the code of c...
Income Tax : Madras High Court held that time-share membership fees could not be fully taxed in the year of receipt since the assessee had cont...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled in favour of the assessee after noting that audited financials, PAN, bank statements, ITRs, confirmations, and ...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that only the actual period lost during the limitation period can be excluded under Explanation-1 to Secti...
Income Tax : The High Court ruled that reopening under Sections 147 and 148 was unsustainable because the Assessing Officer’s reasons amounte...
Income Tax : The Delhi High Court held that shareholders of a foreign company cannot be taxed on the company’s rental income and capital gain...
DGFT : All conditions in policy circular no 15 of 1st February 2011 will continue to apply, except the specification about dates and the ...
The Karnataka High Court ruled that an assessee can claim Section 54 exemption for capital gains on more than one house purchased, citing legislative intent and judicial precedents.
Sale proceeds of vintage car was taxable unless assessee proved that the car was used as a personal asset. Tribunal had rightly reversed the order passed by CIT (A), which had applied irrelevant considerations of wealth tax returns and non-claiming of depreciation in respect of the car by assessee.
The Calcutta High Court dismissed a revenue appeal, upholding the ITAT’s order to delete an addition under Section 68. The court found no question of law.
Bombay High Court held that in absence of express authorization, thus service upon the Chartered Accountant [CA] do not absolve the Tribunal of serving the copies of the order upon the assessee. Thus, appeal allowed and delay condoned.
Where Cooperative Society was engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its members, they deposited excess amount for short term in banks, interest earned was entitled for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
Uttarakhand High Court held that Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be made applicable to short deduction of tax at source and the disallowance made was rightly directed to be deleted. Accordingly, writ of revenue dismissed.
The Madras High Court ruled that short-term capital gains from the sale of depreciable business assets can be set off against brought forward business losses, citing a similar Bombay High Court judgment.
Calcutta High Court dismisses revenue appeal, upholding ITAT’s decision to quash reassessment against Gillanders Arbuthnot due to lack of new evidence.
Calcutta High Court held that merely because share transactions were done through stock exchanges it doesn’t make the transactions genuine. Accordingly, bogus capital loss claim rejected and appeal of revenue allowed.
Calcutta High Court held that addition towards share capital/ premium as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act justified since the assessee did not discharge the creditworthiness and the genuineness of the transactions. Accordingly, appeal of revenue allowed.
