The Companies Act 2013 is a crucial legislation in India governing the incorporation, functioning, and management of companies. Learn about the key provisions, compliance requirements, and legal framework under the Companies Act 2013.
CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive guide covering 175 legal compliances for July 2026 under FEMA, Income Tax, GST, SEBI, Companies Act, Labour Laws, ...
Company Law : The Companies Act, 2013 requires most companies to hold four Board Meetings annually, while OPCs, Small Companies, and Dormant Com...
Company Law : This guide provides a complete AGM compliance tracker covering pre-AGM, AGM-day, post-AGM, and IEPF obligations under the Companie...
Company Law : MCA has revised the Director KYC framework, requiring DIR-3 KYC (Web) only once every three financial years. The changes reduce co...
Company Law : Learn how the Companies Act, 2013 regulates managerial remuneration through profit-linked limits, approval requirements, and gover...
Company Law : MCA has cautioned stakeholders against phishing calls, WhatsApp messages, emails, fake websites, and ZIP attachments impersonating...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the Government to amend the law to allow Company Secretaries in Practice to appear before DRTs and DRATs. It argues...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the MCA to ensure eligible companies comply with Section 203 by appointing Whole-time Company Secretaries. The repr...
Corporate Law : NSO has launched the Annual Survey of Incorporated Services Sector Enterprises (ASISSE) to collect comprehensive economic and oper...
Company Law : ICSI has requested the MCA to grant compliance relaxations following technical disruptions caused by the Data Centre fire. The pro...
Company Law : Madhya Pradesh HC dismissed a winding up petition, holding that a bona fide dispute over liability required adjudication before th...
Company Law : NCLT retained the freeze on assets citing serious SFIO findings but ordered defreezing of the salary account and family members' a...
Corporate Law : The Court ruled that, without a transfer application and parallel insolvency proceedings, shifting a winding-up case to NCLT was u...
Company Law : NCLT permitted stakeholder meetings after accepting clarifications on forfeited warrants, disclosures, and scheme compliance under...
Company Law : The NCLAT held that CFO nominees must satisfy the eligibility requirements under Section 203 of the Companies Act. It set aside th...
Company Law : MCA has allowed companies to file Form DPT-3 for FY 2025-26 without additional fees until 31 July 2026 due to disruptions caused b...
Company Law : MCA notifies the New Development Bank under Section 2(11)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013, specifying it as a body corporate for th...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Regional Director, Eastern Region, reduces penalty for Section 158 DIN violations to ₹2.25 lakh in the MPS Distributors Pvt. Ltd. case. Appeal details inside.
Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violations and appeal process included.
Understand related party transactions, their regulatory framework under the Companies Act and SEBI LODR, and their role in corporate governance and compliance.
Kalpakkam Nidhi Ltd fined Rs. 20,000 for non-compliance with Rule 14(6) of Companies Act. IT order mandates payment within 90 days, with appeal options available.
Learn about the distinction between public issues and private placements under the Companies Act, 2013, including regulations, limits, and compliance.
Adjudication order issued to Jasbir Singh for violating Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013. Penalty of ₹2,00,000 imposed by ROC Punjab and Chandigarh.
The law was well settled that the Resolution Plan which was approved by the CoC could not be allowed to be withdrawn and any clause which contemplate withdrawal of the plan was unenforceable unless section 30(2) of the IBC was breached.
Adjudication order under Companies Act, 2013 for M/s Aasvas Nidhi Ltd for non-compliance with Section 158. Penalty imposed on company and directors for violations.
Sonasuman Constech Engineers fined for failing to comply with Section 158 of the Companies Act 2013. Penalty imposed on company & directors for non-compliance.
Sonasuman Constech Engineers Pvt Ltd penalized for violating Sections 134(1) and 134(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 for non-signing of financial statements.
