Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
NCLAT Delhi held that lease hold rights are assets of Corporate Debtor hence termination of the same by GIDC is in violation of section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Thus, appeal filed by Resolution Professional deserves to be allowed.
IBBI’s First Appellate Authority dismisses multiple appeals by Shashi Agarwal, citing abuse of RTI Act through repetitive and frivolous queries.
NCLT Mumbai approved resolution plan of Corporate Debtor [Cane Agro Energy (India) Ltd] as submitted by resolution applicant [M/s. Raigaon Sugar & Power Ltd.] as resolution plan meets requirements of section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
NCLT Chandigarh held that since resolution plan in respect of Nav Jyoti Agro Foods Private Limited meets requirement of section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 the same stands approved as filed by the resolution professional.
The Adjudicating Authority by the impugned order rejected MA No.03 of 2023. The Adjudicating Authority held that non-compliance by the Appellant of Regulation 21A, sub-regulation (2), the assets of Haldia Unit has become the Liquidation Estate of the CD.
The Respondent had preferred applicaton under Section 66 of the Code wherein Respondent Nos. 1-2 are the suspended directors and the Nos. 3-5 are promoters qua the CD and the Applicants herein are arrayed as Respondents No. 6-9.
NCLT Mumbai held that the Advance received by the Corporate Debtor against future supply of goods is an Operational Debt. Petition u/s. 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code admitted since Corporate Debtor failed to pay operational debt.
NCLAT Delhi held that as per section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, CoC is empowered to take decision to liquidate the Corporate Debtor thus resolution passed with 100% vote share directing for liquidation of Corporate Debtor [Go Airlines] justified.
There’s a lack of real space to unpack the inappropriateness of certain aspects of IBBI’s 2025 reforms is difficult: the reform questions it poses of the evolving structure and normative priorities of India’s insolvency regime are complex.
NCLT rules corporate debtor can raise pre-existing dispute even without timely reply to IBC Section 8 notice, rejects insolvency application.
