Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Learn how secured creditors can relinquish or realize their security interest during liquidation under IBC, including timelines and procedures under Section 52.
India’s IBC shows significant recovery rates. 8,000+ CIRPs initiated, with 3,485 debtors rescued. Learn about amendments & reforms.
IBBI extends regulation 5(a) period from twelve to twenty-four months in Insolvency Professionals Amendment Regulations, 2025, effective on publication.
IBBI updates Form H under CIRP Regulations, 2016 through Second Amendment Regulations, 2025, detailing compliance and procedural requirements.
Allahabad High Court referred the investigation in matter of Noida Sports City Scheme 2010-2011 to CBI to unearth scam since dirty nexus of the builders and the officials of the Noida Authority was noted, where benefits after benefit were doled out to the builders.
IBBI suspends Insolvency Professional Anil Mehta for three months due to misconduct in handling Pratibha Industries Limited’s liquidation.
IBBI Disciplinary Committee refers the complaint against Vakati Balasubramanyam Reddy for re-examination, citing procedural concerns. Read the full order details.
On an application filed u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Corporate Debtor – Lavasa Corporation Limited was admitted to insolvency resolution process by order dated 30.08.2018.
NCLAT Delhi held that post approval of resolution plan both by CoC and the adjudicating authority, it cannot be reopened on the basis of claims being belatedly agitated by the appellant. Thus, admission of claim rightly rejected by adjudicating authority.
The appellant/writ petitioner was under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 initiated by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kochi.
