Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Anup Kumar Singh Vs Union of India & others (Calcutta High Court) Calcutta High Court held that issuance of provisional seizure order under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 [FEMA] is in complete disregard of the moratorium prescribed by section 33(5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] since the provisions of the IBC would override the […]
NCLAT Chennai rejects M.K. Rajagopalan’s appeal against the approval of S. Rajendran’s resolution plan for Vasan Health Care, citing lack of locus standi as an unsuccessful applicant.
NCLT rejects CIRP Initiation as Notice sent to incorrect address, default amounts falling within the Section 10-A period, the incorrect calculation and omission of interest in the demand notice
NCLT Chennai rules that the ₹1 crore threshold for initiating insolvency proceedings against a corporate debtor also applies to their personal guarantors under IBC.
NCLAT Delhi held that no default falling within the prohibited period of Section 10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code can form basis for initiating CIRP. Accordingly, section 9 application rightly rejected.
NCLAT Delhi held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] is not maintainable due to pre-existing dispute between the parties. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
BBI suspends IP Vikas Prakash Gupta for one year for receiving fees designated for a separate support agency, violating transparency rules and Code of Conduct. Order takes effect in 30 days.
IBBI DC warns IP Kushvinder Singhal for modifying a lease without prior CoC approval in Startlit Powers CIRP, citing procedural lapse despite benefit to CD.
NCLAT Delhi held that initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for failure to honour repayment obligation justified since application filed within limitation period. Accordingly, present appeal dismissed.
NCLAT Chennai held that initiation of the IRP proceeding u/s. 95 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against personal guarantor upheld as no principle of natural justice has been violated, and that the Resolution Professional has given sufficient opportunities.
