Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
IBBI’s Disciplinary Committee reviews allegations against Insolvency Professional Sandeep Goel for non-compliance in CIRP cases, issuing its final order.
IBBI suspends Insolvency Professional Rita Gupta for six months due to regulatory violations in a liquidation case. Investigation ordered for RP Rakesh Takyar.
NCLT Delhi rejects bankrupt’s discharge plea under IBC 138(1), stating only the Bankruptcy Trustee can file. Decision highlights process concerns.
NCLAT clarifies security deposits under MoUs without borrowing effect do not qualify as financial debt under IBC. Read the detailed analysis and judgment highlights.
NCLAT rules charge non-registration under Section 77 doesn’t negate secured creditor status. Upholds claim, differentiating CIRP and liquidation.
SC restores personal insolvency proceedings in Bank of Baroda vs. Farooq Ali Khan, ruling HC overstepped in interfering with IBC procedures. Read the key details.
NCLAT Delhi denies CoC seat to assignee of related party debt post-CIRP. Ruling emphasizes preventing CIRP sabotage and protecting creditor rights.
RTI Act grants access to existing records only; public authorities need not provide opinions, clarifications, or policy recommendations, as emphasized by CIC and SC precedents.
RTI Act permits access only to information held by a public authority and does not require the creation or interpretation of information. The authority found that inquiries regarding investigation status or actions taken by IBBI officials amounted to seeking opinions or advice, which falls outside the scope of the RTI Act.
IBBI suspends valuer Nitin Ashok Garg for six months due to valuation report discrepancies in East Coast Energy liquidation case.
