Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
The NCLT Mumbai held that a personal guarantor’s liability under an on-demand guarantee arises only after proper invocation. Since no separate invocation was established, the insolvency petition was dismissed.
Adjudicating Authority failed to properly examine whether the transactions underlying the Section 7 application were genuine financial debts or merely sham arrangements involving round-tripping and financial layering among related entities.
The issue was whether disciplinary action against an Insolvency Professional could proceed solely on the basis of pending criminal and regulatory proceedings. The IBBI held that definitive findings would be premature until the competent forums adjudicated the underlying allegations.
The NCLT Bengaluru dismissed a creditor’s claim submitted long after the prescribed timeline under the liquidation regulations. The Tribunal held that belated claims cannot reopen an advanced liquidation process.
IBBI has prescribed detailed valuation guidelines mandating standardized reporting, documentation, and asset-specific formats under the IBC. The move aims to improve consistency, credibility, and value maximisation in insolvency proceedings.
The First Appellate Authority found that the appellant had indeed paid Rs. 2,500 to the IBBI despite the CPIO stating otherwise. The Board was directed to refund the amount in accordance with applicable grievance regulations.
The IBBI held that while information available with a public authority can be accessed under the RTI Act, the CPIO is not required to collate or present it in a format preferred by the applicant. Publicly available information need not be recompiled for RTI purposes.
The IBBI appellate authority held that information not maintained by the Board cannot be disclosed under the RTI Act. The ruling reiterates that public authorities are only required to provide records actually held by them.
The First Appellate Authority upheld the rejection of an RTI request seeking an IBBI reference related to avoidance transactions. It held that disclosure would reveal confidential financial and commercial information protected under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act.
The NCLAT held that winding-up proceedings transferred to the NCLT must satisfy the threshold applicable under the IBC at the time of consideration. Since the operational debt claims were below Rs. 1 crore, the petitions were held to be non-maintainable.
