Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
Learn how the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, streamlines debt resolution, balances creditor rights, and enables time-bound corporate restructuring and liquidation.
The IBBI suspends an insolvency professional for one year for incorrect claim verification and improper CoC constitution, leading to unnecessary CIRP costs.
Valuer suspended for six months due to failure in properly valuing financial and intangible assets during CIRP and liquidation, with inadequate due diligence cited by IBBI.
A valuer was suspended for three months by IBBI due to alleged non-inclusion of intangibles and disputed asset valuations during the CIRP of a corporate debtor.
A registered valuer was suspended for three months by IBBI for failing to adequately value key financial assets and trade receivables during a corporate liquidation, highlighting the need for due diligence.
The ruling clarifies that the appellant’s remaining limitation period revived in full once the COVID-related exclusion ended. The tribunal found that the petitions filed in August 2022 fell within the recomputed timeline. The decision underscores that the 90-day rule applies only where the remaining limitation is shorter.
The Tribunal held that the right to apply accrued in 2016 based on the last Operational Creditor invoice, making the Section 9 application time-barred. It found the lower authority erred in treating a later invoice as extending limitation.
The IBC Amendment Bill, 2025 tackles delays and litigation in Sections 43–51 & 66 avoidance cases by clarifying timelines, data access, and recovery distribution. This reform ensures faster, more predictable CIRP and liquidation outcomes.
NCLT Delhi admitted a Section 7 application for initiating CIRP against a company for defaulting on a ₹9.97 crore loan. The tribunal appointed an IRP and declared a moratorium on recovery actions.
The Tribunal held that the Corporate Debtor’s silence and lack of dispute confirmed the existence of debt, resulting in CIRP initiation against the company.
