Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
The amendment mandates time-bound decisions by NCLT to speed up insolvency resolution. It ensures accountability and faster case disposal.
The amendment limits withdrawal only between CoC constitution and invitation of resolution plans. It ensures procedural discipline and avoids disruption of insolvency proceedings.
The amendment replaces discretion with a mandatory framework for admitting applications upon proof of default. It ensures faster initiation of CIRP and reduces judicial delays.
The amendment removes automatic moratorium protection for personal guarantors upon filing insolvency applications. It ensures creditors can continue recovery actions and prevents delay tactics.
Article examines Section 58C under CIIRP, highlighting procedural disputes, conversion risks, and regulatory gaps that may affect speedy insolvency resolution.
Article examines how IBC is meant for insolvency resolution, not debt recovery, and why using it as a recovery tool may weaken its legislative purpose.
The issue highlights limitations of India’s current insolvency framework relying on bilateral agreements. The key takeaway is that adopting UNCITRAL ensures coordinated and efficient cross-border insolvency resolution.
A statutory tax charge d noidt constitute a secured interest under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) therefore, the Court directed the removal of the TNVAT Department’s attachment over the corporate debtor’s property.
IBBI has extended the last date for stakeholder comments on key insolvency discussion papers. The move allows more time for feedback while keeping submission conditions unchanged.
The issue was whether delayed charges without supporting records could qualify as operational debt. The Tribunal ruled that absence of invoices and ledger entries made the claim unascertained and disputed.
