Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
NCLAT Delhi held that as there exists financial debt and default, application u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is duly admissible.
NCLAT Delhi held that liquidator is obliged to consider the average of the value arrived as per Regulation 35 of the CIRP Regulation, 2016.
Supreme Court reaffirmed that Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be invoked against third parties and that civil remedies available under the law must be pursued for recovery of dues from such parties.
Recently, the Delhi High Court in the case of Rajiv Chakraborty vs Enforcement Directorate revisited the issue pertaining to the tussle between the Prevention on Money Laundering Act 2002, Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002, and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 and emphasized on the need of a coherent and balanced approach while interpreting these statutes.
The DC notes that it is recorded in the minutes of 15th CoC meeting held on 22.04.2022 that “RP further informed that complete records of Corporate Debtor is not available prior to year 2015 as EOW has seized some records vide Memo dated 10.12.2015. RP approached to the EOW office New Delhi for releasing the records […]
Explore the position of a Recovery Certificate Holder under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Learn about the Supreme Courts interpretation in the Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. A. Balakrishnan case, addressing issues of maintainability, applicability of limitation, and the widened scope of financial debts and creditors.
In Associate Décor Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner case, Karnataka HC weighs moratorium’s effect on tax proceedings under IBC, halting them pending resolution.
Explore the computation of limitation period in SICA cases under the IBC Code. Understand exclusion of suspension period and implications on filing applications under Section 9.
Insolvency Professional found guilty of misrepresentation and entering into unauthorized agreements by IBBI Disciplinary Committee The Disciplinary Committee of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has found Mr. Kairav Anil Trivedi, an Insolvency Professional, guilty of misrepresentation and entering into unauthorized agreements. The committee found that Mr. Trivedi misrepresented the confirmation of his […]
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) Disciplinary Committee has cleared Mr. Ganga Ram Agarwal, an Insolvency Professional, of allegations made against him. The allegations pertained to his failure to represent the interests of a corporate debtor in ongoing cases before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT). After considering Mr. Agarwal’s submissions and the relevant provisions […]
