Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Explore the pros and cons of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Understand its impact on insolvency proceedings in India.
NCLT Chennai held that once the resolution plan is approved by Committee of Creditors, only limited judicial review is available for the Adjudicating Authority u/s. 30(2) and Section 31 of IBC, 2016 and this Adjudicating Authority cannot venture into the commercial aspects of the decisions taken by the Committee of Creditors.
Supreme Court held that a holding company and its subsidiary are always distinct legal entities and hence assets of the subsidiary company of the corporate debtor cannot be part of the resolution plan of the corporate debtor.
IBBIs recent order finds Vijaykumar Varun in violation of Insolvency Code provisions. Read details on non-compliance and disciplinary actions taken.
NCLT Bengaluru held that ‘right fees’ for which operational creditor (BCCI) is liable to be paid by Corporate Debtor (BYJU’s) falls within the definition of ‘operational debt’ within section 5(21) of the Code. Hence, petition filed u/s 9 to initiate CIRP accepted.
ITAT Delhi held that written off of obsolete inventory allowable as prepared in accordance with accounting standards and duly got prepared audited report of an independent auditor.
Read about the IBBI Disciplinary Committee’s decision on Mr. S. Diraviam regarding alleged violations during a corporate insolvency resolution process. Insights on findings, penalties, and implications discussed.
NCLAT Delhi ruled that financial creditors who are allottees under RERA must meet the threshold criteria to file a Section 7 application under IBC. Learn more about the judgment.
Read the full text of the NCLAT judgment/order in A. Vijayan & Ors. vs Silver Line Retreat Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Understand why the tribunal criticized the filing of voluminous records and how it impacts legal proceedings.
Submission of Appellant that since guarantee has not been invoked there is no debt cannot be accepted. Guarantee continues to bind Corporate Guarantor to discharge its liability and fact that as on date, guarantee has not been invoked, cannot be a ground for Appellant to be liquidated under Section 59 of IBC.
