Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
Explore the AVJ Heights vs. India Infoline case, NCLAT’s stance on Section 185 compliance in CIRP claims, implications for financial institutions, and legal analysis.
Delhi High Court rules parties in IBC proceedings must receive requisite documents forming basis of SCNs. Detailed analysis of Shantanu Prakash vs. State Bank of India & Ors. case.
NCLT determined that the certificate under the Bankers Book Evidence Act, 1891, despite lacking a date, was valid as it was duly signed. They emphasized that the omission of the date did not invalidate the certificate.
“In the Milind Kashiram Jadhav vs. State Bank of India case, NCLAT Delhi examines if loan recall notice or NPA declaration determines default date under IBC Code.”
NCLAT clarifies that absence of GST refund/ITC claim in demand notice or Form 5 is not grounds for default under CIRP as per Section 9 of IBC.
NCLAT Delhi rules on Sanam Fashion Vs Ktex Nonwovens case, addressing a pre-existing contractual dispute on delivery terms and goods transportation under IBC.
Learn about the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), its functions, impact, and powers. Understand its role in regulating insolvency proceedings and promoting a transparent framework.
Delhi High Court’s judgment clarifies that IBC proceedings don’t preclude court jurisdiction for Section 11 applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Read the detailed analysis of Namdev Hindurao Patil’s appeal against his ineligibility to submit a resolution plan for Warana Dairy. Learn how the NCLAT dismissed his plea.
Regarding Section 14 of the IBC, court clarified that moratorium only applies to corporate debtor, not to natural persons like directors for their vicarious liability.
