Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Incred Financial Services Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Incred Financial Services Limited (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai upheld the order of CIT(A) directing AO to grant TDS credit after verification where short credit of ₹1.68 crore arose due to mismatch between ITR claim and Form 26AS. The assessee had claimed TDS of ₹22.20 crore, but only ₹20.61 crore was allowed in processing u/s 143(1). CIT(A) directed AO to allow TDS reflected in Form 26AS and also consider TDS deducted but not appearing in 26AS, subject to verification and indemnity bond, relying on judicial precedents that credit should not be denied merely because deductor failed ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031