Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kishore Anand Shetty Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kishore Anand Shetty Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee challenged (i) addition u/s 50C based on higher stamp duty value and (ii) denial of exemption u/s 54F on reinvestment in a residential flat. The Tribunal noted that the original stamp valuation was wrongly inflated due to inclusion of an approach road area and was later rectified through a supplementary deed, reducing valuation below declared sale consideration. Hence, invocation of sec.50C failed and addition of ₹13.47 lakh was deleted. Regarding sec.54F, the AO denied exemption since the agreement for purchase of the new flat was date...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031