Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Savita Devi Vs ITO (ITAT Patna)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Savita Devi Vs ITO (ITAT Patna)

Assessee, an uneducated village housewife, was reopened u/s 147 based on information that she possessed term deposits of ₹5.33 crore. Having received only the initial notice, she responded through a local advocate denying the transaction, but subsequent notices went to a wrong email ID mistakenly entered on the portal. AO proceeded ex parte u/s 144/147 & added the entire ₹5.33 crore u/s 69A. CIT(A) refused to condone 140 days’ dela

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031