This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Excessive Pricing Claims Fail as DG Did Not Compare Charges With Similar Hospitals
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vivek Sharma Vs Max Super Specialty Hospital, Patparganj (Competition Commission of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Vivek Sharma Vs Max Super Specialty Hospital, Patparganj (Competition Commission of India)
The matter before the Competition Commission of India arose from information filed under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 against Becton Dickinson India Pvt. Ltd. and Max Super Specialty Hospital, Patparganj. The Informant alleged that disposable syringes sold at the hospital’s in-house pharmacy carried higher MRPs than identical syringes sold in the open market, allegedly due to collusion between the manufacturer and the hospital.
After a prima facie order under Section 2...
Author Info
