Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Delay Condoned Due to Bona Fide Reason: Penalty Appeal Revived

Case Law Details

Case Name
Satbir Kumar Sarlia Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2011-12
Advertisement
Satbir Kumar Sarlia Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) VSV Settlement for Quantum Does Not Wipe Out Independent 271D Penalty-960-Day Delay Condoned; Penalty u/s 271D Remanded— Assessee filed appeal against penalty u/s 271D of ₹1,38,00,000 for alleged acceptance of cash loans above ₹20,000 in violation of s.269SS. Appeal was delayed by 960 days. Assessee submitted affidavit explaining that he had opted for Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) only for quantum proceedings & believed rectification u/s 154 (pending before CIT(A)) would resolve the issue; hence appeal before Tribunal was filed belatedly as a protect...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *