Case Law Details
Case Name : Satbir Kumar Sarlia Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satbir Kumar Sarlia Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
VSV Settlement for Quantum Does Not Wipe Out Independent 271D Penalty-960-Day Delay Condoned; Penalty u/s 271D Remanded—
Assessee filed appeal against penalty u/s 271D of ₹1,38,00,000 for alleged acceptance of cash loans above ₹20,000 in violation of s.269SS. Appeal was delayed by 960 days. Assessee submitted affidavit explaining that he had opted for Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) only for quantum proceedings & believed rectification u/s 154 (pendi
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


