Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajesh Gandhi Vs Sanghpriya Singh (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rajesh Gandhi Vs Sanghpriya Singh (ITAT Delhi) 153C Addition for Property Deal Quashed as AY 2012-13 Falls Outside Permissible Ten-Year Search Block Based on a seized receipt found in a 2020 search of a third party, the Assessing Officer invoked section 153C and added ₹68 lakh under section 68 for AY 2012-13, alleging unaccounted consideration in sale of a flat by the assessee. Before the Tribunal, the assessee contended that the proceedings were time-barred. Crucially, the Revenue could not produce any satisfaction note under section 153C showing when the seized material was handed over to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031