Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Poonam Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Poonam Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Pursuant to a search conducted in March 2019, the Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 153A on 20.01.2020 in the name of the assessee, who had already expired in September 2019. Although a fresh notice under section 153A was later issued in January 2021 in the name of the legal heir, the assessment order referred only to the first notice issued to the deceased and even a subsequent notice under section 142(1) was again issued in the deceased’s name. The Tribunal noted from the chronology of events that the assessment was effectively based on the invalid...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930