Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santhosh Abraham Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santhosh Abraham Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The ITAT Chennai allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted penalty of ₹2,57,631 levied u/s 270A for alleged under-reporting of income. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had not filed return due to Covid-19 illness but later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 declaring salary income which was fully accepted in assessment without any variation. Since almost the entire tax liability was already covered through TDS and there was no concealment or tax evasion, the assessee’s explanation was held to be bona fide and covered under section 270A(6...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031