ITAT Chennai

Confirmation letter by creditor establishes only identity & not creditworthiness & genuineness

A. Godwin Maria Visuvasam Vs. ITO (ITAT Chennai)

A. Godwin Maria Visuvasam Vs. ITO (ITAT Chennai) Merely furnishing of confirmation letter by a creditor, as it again well settled, does not would at best only establish identity of the creditors. There was nothing on record establishing creditworthiness of the creditors and/or genuineness of impugned loans and advances in the instant case...

Read More

Two different floors of one house property cannot be treated as two different residential houses

ITO Vs. Nathamuni Krishnaswamy Balaji (ITAT Chennai)

Where assessee purchased Ground Floor of the house property and had also purchased first floor of the said house property and deduction for both the ground floor and the first floor under section 54F by treating both the floors as one single residential unit thus he was entitled to became two different floors of one house property could n...

Read More

No Taxability under Income Tax Provisions if no tax under respective DTAA

DCIT vs. Ford India Limited (ITAT Chennai)

Recently, in DCIT vs. Ford India Limited & vice-versa[I.T.A. Nos. 673 and 840 /Chny/2015 and I.T.A. Nos. 748 and 749 /Chny/2015, A.Y. 2011-12 and 2012-13, decided on 31.01.2017], one of the question raised before ITAT, Chennai was whether CIT(A) erred in deleting the tax...

Read More

Power to rectify a mistake U/s. 254(2) cannot be used to recall entire order

Technip India Ltd. Vs. Asst. CIT (ITAT Chennai)

Section 254 does not indicate that Tribunal can recall entire order and pass a fresh decision and power to rectify a mistake under section 254(2) could not be used for recalling entire order....

Read More

ITAT Judgment on year of taxability in case of JDA

ITO & Anr. Vs Shafiq Mohammed Shah & Anr. (ITAT Chennai)

These cross appeals by the Revenue and by the assessee are directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals)-4,Chenaai dated 8-2-2016....

Read More

Deduction U/s. 54 allowable on sale consideration invested one year before sale of property

Devichand Kanthilal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)Devichand Kanthilal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai); IT Appeal No. 3353 (Mds.) of 2016; 31/05/2017; 2013-14

In this case, the investment was admittedly made one year before the date of sale of property. In view of language employed by Parliament in section 54 of the Act, it is not the requirement that the sale consideration has to be invested in purchase of property....

Read More

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) leviable on Income disclosed in return filed pursuant to notice U/s. 153A without proper explanation

Asst. CIT Vs. S & P Foundation (P) Ltd. (ITAT Chennai)

Where no return was filed prior to the date of search and a return had been filed only after the issue of notice under section 153A and in respect of income offered by assessee no proper explanation was provided regarding nature and source of income, AO was justified in initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c)....

Read More

Section 61: In case of revocable trust, its income needs to be taxed in hands of beneficiaries

Tamil Nadu Urban Development Fund Vs. ITO (ITAT Chennai)

These appeals are filed by the assessee against an order dated 30-3-2016 of the Commissioner (Appeals)-2, Chennai, in I.T.A. No. 31/CIT(A)-2/2013-14 for the assessment year 2008-09 and the order dated 30-3-2016 of the Commissioner (Appeals)-2, Chennai, in I.T.A. No. 174/CIT(A)-2/2013-14 for the assessment year 2009-10....

Read More

Additional depreciation cannot be claimed on Machinery used during earlier years

M/s. CRI Pumps (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)

First requirement to claim of additional depreciation is that there should a new machinery or plant. A machinery is new till it is first put to use. Once it is used, it is no longer a new machinery. Admittedly, the machinery, on which additional depreciation has been claimed, was already used in various preceding previous […]...

Read More

Assessee allowed Deduction U/s. 54 depsite non completion of construction within 3 years

Kannan Chandrasekar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals)-4, Chennai dated 19-8-2016 pertaining to assessment year 2012-13. 2. The only grievance in this appeal of assessee is non-granting of exemption under section 54 of the Act in respect of sale of the residential property....

Read More
Page 1 of 2212345...1020...Last »

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,533)
Company Law (3,482)
Custom Duty (6,692)
DGFT (3,522)
Excise Duty (4,055)
Fema / RBI (3,301)
Finance (3,516)
Income Tax (25,480)
SEBI (2,763)
Service Tax (3,289)