Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nakoda Developers Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nakoda Developers Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee, a real estate developer, purchased property for ₹3.25 cr whereas stamp duty value was higher. The AO invoked sec. 56(2)(x) and added ₹1.14 cr being difference between stamp value and purchase consideration. During appeal, based on DVO’s preliminary valuation, CIT(A) reduced addition to ₹28.66 lakh. Before ITAT, the Tribunal noted that statutory tolerance band of 10% applies while comparing actual consideration and valuation. Following judicial precedents treating this provision as beneficial and retrospective, ITAT held that where d...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031