Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sahodhar Reddy Muddasani Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sahodhar Reddy Muddasani Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) No Capital Gains on JDA Without Consideration or Transfer of Possession: ITAT Hyderabad Deletes Addition u/s 45 The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT deleted the addition of ₹3.65 lakh made towards long-term capital gains, holding that mere execution of a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) does not give rise to a taxable transfer unless consideration is received or possession is handed over in the manner contemplated under law. The assessee, along with other co-owners, had entered into a JDA with a developer. The Assessing Officer treated the execut...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031