ITAT Hyderabad

No Section 271B Penalty if books of account not maintained

Naveen Kumar Kaparthy Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Naveen Kumar Kaparthy Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) In the instant case, when the books of account are not maintained, the AO did not initiate any proceedings for not maintaining the books of account. The AO obviously satisfied that the books of account were not maintained for good and sufficient reasons. When the AO accepted the […]...

Read More

ITAT disallowed loss on Sales made at lower rate to reduce taxable Profit

Agarwal Global Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

Agarwal Global Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) We observe that even if we consider the selling price @ 30,675.56 by M/s Gautham Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. and the same was purchased from the assessee @ 25,000/- per MT with tax, the difference would be Rs. 4,500/- per MT. We gave opportunity to both […]...

Read More

Order of ITO cannot be branded as erroneous by CIT simply because order was not elaborate

Smt. K. Krishnaveni Vs I.T.O. (ITAT Hyderabad)

In the present case before us, the assessee has offered the capital gains tax in the next year and there has not been any prejudice to the revenue. Further, the assessee has explained to the query raised during the scrutiny proceedings before the Assessing Officer was answered to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer. Hence, the Order...

Read More

Salary cannot be disallowed for mere non furnishing copies of appointment order, attendance register

Manne Hareesh Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Manne Hareesh Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) During the course of scrutiny assessment proceedings, it was observed by the Ld. AO that the assessee has debited in his P & L Account an amount of Rs. 2,40,000 towards Accounting Charges. On query, it was explained by the assessee that the outstanding amount of Rs. 2,40,000 was […]...

Read More

Mere discrepancy in Form 26AS & 16 not amounts to concealment

Chalapati Katiki Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Taking into account the amount mentioned in Form 26AS it could not be said that the assessee had concealed amount or furnished inaccurate particulars of income. However, penalty was restricted to the tax sought to be evaded on the amount of commission income not disclosed by assessee....

Read More

Basic administrative expenses incurred after setting up but before commencement of business allowable

Vil Media (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

 Assessee having already set up its business was eligible to claim basic administrative expenditure as business expenditure though business operations were commenced in the subsequent year....

Read More

TDS on Commission to foreign agents having No PE in India for services rendered outside India

Vimta Labs Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT held that the business receipts of the foreign residents are not taxable in India since the agents have no PE in India and therefore, the assessee was not required to make TDS u/s 195 of the Act. Therefore, the assessee’s appeals for all the three A.Ys are allowed....

Read More

Section 254(2) Non-consideration of decisions is mistake apparent from law

M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Private Ltd Vs Addl. CIT (TDS) (ITAT Hyderabad)

M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Private Ltd Vs Addl. CIT (TDS) (ITAT Hyderabad) We have perused the order of the Tribunal and find that in Para 8 of the order, the Tribunal has considered the applicability of sub-section (3) of section 201(1) also to 201(1A) and has clearly held that sub section (3) refers only to an […]...

Read More

Reassessment invalid if section 148 notice not served within stipulated period

B. M. Land Developers & Builders Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Though AO had issued notice under section 148 on 26-3-2014, i.e., within period of six years from the end of relevant assessment year, however, it was returned unserved by postal authorities and even notice by affixture was also served on 4-4-2014 and there was no report of AO containing names and addresses of witnesses having identified ...

Read More

Erroneous Assessment order cannot be revised if not prejudicial to Revenue

Pravardhan Seeds (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

CIT should not stop merely on finding that the order was erroneous but also had to establish that the order of AO was prejudicial to the interests of revenue. Thus, revision could not be made in such a case and the order of AO was restored....

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,438)
Company Law (5,281)
Custom Duty (7,558)
DGFT (4,090)
Excise Duty (4,318)
Fema / RBI (3,947)
Finance (4,105)
Income Tax (31,607)
SEBI (3,295)
Service Tax (3,507)