ITAT Hyderabad

Distribution of IPL Tickets to Customers to improve Business Relations is allowable as Expenditure: ITAT

M/s. EPE Process Filters & Accumulators Pvt Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

M/s. EPE Process Filters & Accumulators Pvt Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Assessee’s submissions in support of its claim u/s 37 of the Act are that it has purchased the IPL cricket match tickets to distribute them amongst its long standing customers to garner their goodwill and improve its business relations and therefore, it is [&h...

Read More

Machinery rent cannot be taxed as Income from House Property for TDS deduction under wrong head

Heritage Hospitality Ltd. Vs DCIt (ITAT Hyderabad)

AO’s opinion that since TDS made u/s. 194-I, incomes are to be assessed under head ‘income from house property’ can not be accepted. Moreover, even if assessee has let out property but, when the Memorandum of Association permits the business of letting out of properties as such, the income cannot be brought to tax as ‘income from ...

Read More

S. 50C Addition without reference to Valuation Officer not justified

Jayashree Kothari Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Jayashree Kothari Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Sec. 50C(2) enables the Assessing Officer to make a reference to the Valuation Officer. Whenever a reference is made by the AO to the Valuation Officer, such reference has to be construed as a reference made under sec. 16A(1) of the Wealth-tax Act. We have also carefully gone through […]...

Read More

Network Rights is Goodwill eligible for depreciation U/s. 32(1)(ii)

Apna Incable Broad Band Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

Apna Incable Broad Band Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) The AO was of the opinion that the network rights are not intangible assets and therefore, depreciation is not allowable thereon. The AO treated the network rights as “goodwill” and observing that no depreciation is allowable on goodwill u/s 32(1)(ii) of the Act, he [...

Read More

Education cess is nothing but an additional surcharge & part of taxes

R.A.K. Ceramics, UAE Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

Article 2(1) of the India-UAE DTAA provides that the taxes covered shall include tax and surcharge thereon. Education cess is nothing but an additional surcharge & is also covered by the definition of taxes....

Read More

Stock-in-trade transfers in the year in which sale deed gets executed

Shri Challa Ramakrishna Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT held that Stock- in-trade can be considered as transferred only in the year in which the assessee has executed the sale deed transferring the stock-in-trade and not when the assessee has given stock-in-trade for joint development to the builder. As already held in the above cases, the provisions of section 2(47)(v) would apply only t...

Read More

USA Federal & state tax eligible for tax credit under Income Tax Act, 1961

Pritesh Rajesh Kotak Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Assessee was eligible to claim tax credit both federal as well as state taxes paid on the income earned during the year as section 91 did not discriminate between State and Federal taxes, and in effect provides for both the types of Income-taxes to be taken into account for the purpose of tax credits against Indian Income-tax liability....

Read More

S. 154 Applying individual tax rates to AOP not a mistake apparent from records

M/s. Shreeya Welfare Trust Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Conclusion: Since assessee- AOP was a trust formed for the benefit of a sole beneficiary, therefore, applying individual tax rates to assessee-AOP was not a mistake apparent on the face of the record and therefore, it could not be rectified through Section 154....

Read More

No TDS default if recipient paid tax on income

ACIT Vs Chaitanya Educational Trust (ITAT Hyderabad)

ACIT Vs Chaitanya Educational Trust (ITAT Hyderabad) Since the assessee has filed the certificates of the recipients with proof that the recipients have offered the income to tax in their hands, the assessee shall not be treated as an assessee in default u/s 201(1) of the Act. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT All are […]...

Read More

Transfer of a portion of land in lieu of built-up area on retained land vid JDA was transfer u/s 2(47)(v)

Udai Hospitals Private Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

By virtue of JDA, assessee was parting with a portion of its land and in consideration thereof, was receiving built-up area on the land retained by it which was a transfer within the meaning of section 2(47)(v) however, AO was directed to re-compute the capital gain again by considering only elements which were necessary for the construc...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,180)
Company Law (4,836)
Custom Duty (7,325)
DGFT (3,955)
Excise Duty (4,224)
Fema / RBI (3,779)
Finance (3,955)
Income Tax (30,259)
SEBI (3,150)
Service Tax (3,460)