Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : The issue concerns the statutory framework governing the appointment of Managing Directors under the Companies Act, 2013. The guid...
Company Law : The issue was whether bank bill discounting facilities require disclosure in Form DPT-3. It was clarified that only amounts outsta...
Company Law : The article explains that loans received from partnership firms do not qualify as exempt borrowings under the Companies (Acceptanc...
Company Law : Shareholder loans received by private companies do not qualify as exempted borrowings under Rule 2(1)(c). The article explains why...
Company Law : The article explains that focusing only on environmental goals weakens ESG effectiveness. Social responsibility and ethical govern...
Company Law : ICSI has advised members to verify and update their contact and address details maintained in the Institute's records. Accurate in...
Company Law : The MCA has widened CSR eligibility by recognizing subscriptions to Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments as a valid CSR activity...
Company Law : Provisional list of audit firms of listed companies yet to file NFRA-2 for 2023-24. Filing deadline was 30.11.2025; fines apply fo...
Company Law : ICSI recommended restoring public access to basic company master data without mandatory login requirements. The representation sta...
Company Law : The issue concerns eligibility and participation rules for the convocation. ICSI has clarified that members who do not attend will...
Company Law : The issue concerned the maintainability of a class action petition under the Companies Act. The SC, acting on the parties' consent...
Company Law : The issue was whether Section 245 of the Companies Act applies only to continuing acts. The NCLAT held that claims involving damag...
Company Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that developments occurring during the pendency of proceedings could be incorporated when they were connected...
Company Law : The Ahmedabad Bench dispensed with several shareholder and creditor meetings after recording consent affidavits approving the prop...
Company Law : The NCLT Allahabad Bench allowed dispensation of meetings for shareholders and creditors in a merger involving wholly owned subsid...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
Registrar of Companies clarified that Section 155 absolutely prohibits holding more than one DIN. Penalties were imposed even though the duplicate DIN was later surrendered through DIR-5.
This guide explains the complete process for quick Private Limited Company registration in India, including required documents, DSC registration, MCA filings, and company incorporation steps.
ROC Delhi penalised a company and its directors after it failed to appoint mandatory independent directors despite crossing the prescribed turnover threshold. The authority held that prolonged non-compliance under Section 149(4) attracted maximum penalty under Section 172 of the Companies Act.
ROC Delhi penalised a company and its directors after special resolutions relating to preferential allotment were filed years beyond the statutory deadline. The authority held that repeated delays under Section 117 attracted maximum penalties under the Companies Act, 2013.
The ROC Mumbai penalized an individual for possessing two Director Identification Numbers contrary to Section 155 of the Companies Act, 2013. The ruling highlights that obtaining duplicate DINs, even inadvertently, can attract continuing penalties under Section 159.
The ROC Mumbai penalized a director for filing incorrect AGM and due dates in Form AOC-4 for FY 2024-25. The ruling highlights that authorized signatories are personally responsible for accuracy of information filed in MCA e-forms.
The ROC Mumbai penalized a company and its Managing Director for omitting the mandatory web link of the annual return in the Board Report for FY 2019-20. The ruling highlights that even seemingly minor disclosure lapses under Section 92(3) can attract penalties under Section 450.
The ROC Mumbai penalized a company and its Managing Director for failing to include mandatory disclosures in the Board Report for FY 2019-20. The ruling highlights that omissions relating to annual return details, cost records, and secretarial standards can attract penalties under Section 134(8).
ROC Goa imposed penalties after finding violations of AS-09 and AS-15 reflected in the auditor’s report for FY 2021-22. The order held that failure to ensure proper compliance in the Directors’ Responsibility Statement attracted independent liability under Section 134(5A).
ROC Mumbai penalized a company and its officers for failing to fill vacancies of independent directors within the statutory timeline. The order reinforces strict compliance requirements under Section 149(4) of the Companies Act.
