Income Tax : The Income Tax Act, 2025 replaces old reassessment provisions with Sections 279 to 286 and increases reopening timelines in certai...
Income Tax : Explains how routine approvals under Section 151 can nullify reassessment proceedings. The key takeaway is that lack of applicatio...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that reassessment cannot run parallel to ongoing scrutiny proceedings. Such action was declared without jurisdiction...
Income Tax : The High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2013-14 were time-barred after computing the surviving limitation as clar...
Income Tax : A detailed look at how the Finance Act, 2021 reshaped Sections 147–151, introduced Section 148A, and reduced limitation periods ...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held reassessment orders invalid because the assessee was not supplied with the recorded reasons for reopening under Se...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court dismissed the challenge to a Delhi High Court ruling that quashed reassessment proceedings under Sections 148A(d...
Income Tax : The Telangana High Court held that reassessment proceedings initiated by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer after implementation...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC held that reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 was valid where Assessing Officer received fresh investigation materi...
Income Tax : The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 148 were invalid where the Assessing Officer sought to make ...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
Supreme Court sets aside reassessment notices for AY 2015-16 issued after April 1, 2021, based on Revenue’s concession in the Rajeev Bansal case.
Kolkata ITAT rules tax assessments cannot be reopened beyond four years if assessee disclosed facts during original scrutiny, citing Supreme Court precedent.
Hyderabad ITAT invalidates reassessment citing AO’s factual error and delayed reasons, denying assessee objection right. Follows SC, HC precedents.
Rajasthan High Court backs tax authorities’ power to reopen assessments based on new information, citing Supreme Court rulings on ‘reason to believe’.
Bombay High Court sets aside Section 148-A notice issued to Dilip Powar, ruling it as a change of opinion and beyond the permissible time limit.
ITAT Raipur quashes Sec 147 reassessment in ITO Vs Bishambhar Dayal Agrawal. Held reopening based on change of opinion, not new material, is invalid. Cites Kelvinator.
ITAT Mumbai quashes reassessment order in Raghunandan Bhomia vs DCIT case, citing failure to provide reasons for reopening assessment, violating legal precedents.
ITAT Mumbai quashes reassessment in Top Class Capital Markets Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT due to incomplete disclosure of reasons for reopening under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
Madras HC voids reassessment, ruling change of opinion beyond 4 years is illegal. No non-disclosure by Saravana Stocks found.
Bombay HC voids reassessment notice, citing lack of proof of undisclosed material facts by Hindustan Lever Ltd.
