Income Tax : Understand the statutory time limits for issuing income-tax notices and completing assessments under the Income-tax Act. The guide...
Income Tax : This article explains why reassessment proceedings may be invalid if the Assessing Officer merely relies on Investigation Wing rep...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Act, 2025 replaces old reassessment provisions with Sections 279 to 286 and increases reopening timelines in certai...
Income Tax : Explains how routine approvals under Section 151 can nullify reassessment proceedings. The key takeaway is that lack of applicatio...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that reassessment cannot run parallel to ongoing scrutiny proceedings. Such action was declared without jurisdiction...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : Bombay HC upheld ITAT's order, holding reassessment under Section 148 unsustainable as full reasons were not supplied and relied o...
Income Tax : The Bombay High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 were invalid because the sanction was granted by the PCIT ...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that reassessment notices issued after the surviving limitation period prescribed by the Supreme Court were invalid....
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that reassessment cannot be sustained merely because of high-value bank transactions without evidence ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune held that reassessment proceedings were invalid because the approval under Section 151 was granted by the Principal Comm...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
ITAT Delhi quashes a Rs. 418 crore reassessment order for AY 2009-10 because the notice for reopening under Section 148 was not validly served on the assessee.
The Delhi ITAT has quashed a reassessment based on “borrowed satisfaction,” ruling that the tax department acted without independent inquiry and on suspicion, not tangible material.
Delhi ITAT upholds the quashing of a reassessment against Punjab National Bank, ruling it was based on a mere change of opinion without new material, which is not permitted under tax law.
Delhi ITAT invalidates reassessment notices issued for AY 2015-16 after April 1, 2021. The ruling, based on Supreme Court and High Court precedents, confirms they are time-barred.
ITAT Delhi ruled reassessment invalid as the primary addition forming the basis for reopening was deleted, nullifying other additions under Sections 68 and 69.
The Rajasthan High Court invalidates a reassessment notice against Shree Cement, ruling that the notice was barred by limitation and illegally issued by the JAO.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Income Tax Department’s appeal regarding a reassessment notice, affirming that notices issued by a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer after the faceless regime was introduced are invalid.
ITAT Kolkata ruled that a reassessment is invalid if no addition is made on the original reason for reopening the case, as the foundation for the reassessment collapses.
The ITAT Delhi has quashed the reassessment against Sonia Kapoor, ruling it invalid. The court found that because no addition was made on the initial reason for reopening, the entire process was void.
The ITAT Delhi has ruled that reassessment notices issued under Section 148 after the prescribed limitation cut-off date are invalid, providing relief to the assessee.
