Income Tax : Understand the statutory time limits for issuing income-tax notices and completing assessments under the Income-tax Act. The guide...
Income Tax : This article explains why reassessment proceedings may be invalid if the Assessing Officer merely relies on Investigation Wing rep...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Act, 2025 replaces old reassessment provisions with Sections 279 to 286 and increases reopening timelines in certai...
Income Tax : Explains how routine approvals under Section 151 can nullify reassessment proceedings. The key takeaway is that lack of applicatio...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that reassessment cannot run parallel to ongoing scrutiny proceedings. Such action was declared without jurisdiction...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : Bombay HC upheld ITAT's order, holding reassessment under Section 148 unsustainable as full reasons were not supplied and relied o...
Income Tax : The Bombay High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 were invalid because the sanction was granted by the PCIT ...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that reassessment notices issued after the surviving limitation period prescribed by the Supreme Court were invalid....
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that reassessment cannot be sustained merely because of high-value bank transactions without evidence ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune held that reassessment proceedings were invalid because the approval under Section 151 was granted by the Principal Comm...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
ITAT Mumbai quashes Rs. 2.23 crore tax addition on Anil Jaggi, citing invalid approval for reassessment, a key procedural lapse.
Punjab & Haryana High Court invalidates reassessment notices for Assessment Year 2015-16, citing limitation bar based on Supreme Court precedent.
Rajasthan High Court directs ITO to consider the Supreme Court’s Rajeev Bansal precedent regarding expired limitation periods for AY 2015-16 tax notices.
ITAT Raipur cancels reassessment for Vinay Agrawal (AY 2014-15 & 2015-16) due to time-barred Section 148 notices. Decision relies on Supreme Court rulings in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal.
Supreme Court disposes of ACIT vs Amit Jain petitions, aligning with the Rajeev Bansal judgment. Assessees can pursue remedies on unsettled issues.
Madras High Court sets aside reassessment notice against Thulasidass Prabavathi, citing time-bar and Supreme Court rulings in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal on re-assessment limitation.
Bangalore ITAT cancels reassessment proceedings against Amit Kumar Banthia (HUF) due to the Assessing Officer’s failure to follow mandatory procedures.
The ITAT Delhi set aside a reassessment order against Aashiyana Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd., citing a violation of CBDT instructions on jurisdictional limits, as the DCIT passed the order instead of the ITO.
The ITAT Delhi ruled reassessment notices issued to a dissolved firm, Ganesh Commodity Brokers, were invalid as they were not served on former partners as per Section 283(2) of the Income Tax Act.
Gujarat High Court sets aside Section 148 notice against AIM Fincon Pvt. Ltd., ruling it a mere change of opinion on already disclosed facts.
