Income Tax : Understand the statutory time limits for issuing income-tax notices and completing assessments under the Income-tax Act. The guide...
Income Tax : This article explains why reassessment proceedings may be invalid if the Assessing Officer merely relies on Investigation Wing rep...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Act, 2025 replaces old reassessment provisions with Sections 279 to 286 and increases reopening timelines in certai...
Income Tax : Explains how routine approvals under Section 151 can nullify reassessment proceedings. The key takeaway is that lack of applicatio...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that reassessment cannot run parallel to ongoing scrutiny proceedings. Such action was declared without jurisdiction...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : Bombay HC upheld ITAT's order, holding reassessment under Section 148 unsustainable as full reasons were not supplied and relied o...
Income Tax : The Bombay High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 were invalid because the sanction was granted by the PCIT ...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that reassessment notices issued after the surviving limitation period prescribed by the Supreme Court were invalid....
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that reassessment cannot be sustained merely because of high-value bank transactions without evidence ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune held that reassessment proceedings were invalid because the approval under Section 151 was granted by the Principal Comm...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
The ITAT Chennai has quashed reassessment proceedings against Ashok Leyland Ltd., ruling the AO’s action was based on a change of opinion and not a failure by the assessee to disclose material facts.
ITAT Chennai invalidates a tax reassessment notice issued by a local officer, affirming the mandatory nature of the faceless tax regime as per judicial precedents.
The ITAT Delhi has quashed a reassessment notice, ruling it was based on borrowed satisfaction and mechanical approval from superior tax authorities.
ITAT quashes reassessment against Mauritius-based FPI, ruling that sanction from correct authority under section 151 was mandatory.
ITAT Mumbai quashes a reassessment notice, ruling it was invalid as the sanction was granted by the wrong authority under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act.
Tribunal rules reassessment notice by Jurisdictional AO after 29.03.2022 invalid under Faceless Assessment Scheme; all proceedings quashed.
ITAT Kolkata has ruled a reassessment notice time-barred for income below ₹50 lakh. The tribunal found the notice was issued beyond the three-year limit for AY 2018-19.
Madras High Court sets aside reassessment notice against Unitech Exhibition Pvt. Ltd., ruling it was based on change of opinion and issued beyond the four-year limit without new tangible material.
ITAT Kolkata nullified a reassessment order, ruling that ITO lacked pecuniary jurisdiction to issue a Section 148 notice for a non-corporate assessee with an income over specified limit.
ITAT Hyderabad rules against the re-taxing of a gift, stating that revisiting the same facts to make a new addition is an impermissible “change of opinion.”
