Income Tax : The Income Tax Act, 2025 replaces old reassessment provisions with Sections 279 to 286 and increases reopening timelines in certai...
Income Tax : Explains how routine approvals under Section 151 can nullify reassessment proceedings. The key takeaway is that lack of applicatio...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that reassessment cannot run parallel to ongoing scrutiny proceedings. Such action was declared without jurisdiction...
Income Tax : The High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2013-14 were time-barred after computing the surviving limitation as clar...
Income Tax : A detailed look at how the Finance Act, 2021 reshaped Sections 147–151, introduced Section 148A, and reduced limitation periods ...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held reassessment orders invalid because the assessee was not supplied with the recorded reasons for reopening under Se...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court dismissed the challenge to a Delhi High Court ruling that quashed reassessment proceedings under Sections 148A(d...
Income Tax : The Telangana High Court held that reassessment proceedings initiated by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer after implementation...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC held that reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 was valid where Assessing Officer received fresh investigation materi...
Income Tax : The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 148 were invalid where the Assessing Officer sought to make ...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
This paper aims to: 1.Compare the latest amendments introduced by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 with the law that existed previously; 2. Analyze the intent and rationale behind the legislative changes; 3. Discuss the practical scope and implications of the new provisions on reassessment proceedings.
Madras High Court invalidates reassessment proceedings due to improper sanction under amended Section 151, aligning with Bombay and Delhi High Courts.
Bombay High Court quashes tax re-assessment notice and order against a dissolved company, citing a non-existent entity cannot be assessed. Cites Supreme Court rulings.
SC upheld Gujarat HC’s decision to quash reassessment notice issued by Income Tax Department, citing lack of new material & change of opinion
Delhi ITAT quashes reassessment proceedings against Smt. Seema Swami for AY 2008-09, ruling the Assessing Officer lacked tangible material for a valid reason to believe income escaped assessment.
Delhi High Court dismisses revenue’s appeal in PCIT vs. RMG Polyvinyl (I) Ltd., upholding ITAT’s decision that reassessment was bad in law due to AO’s flawed reasoning.
Explore recent ITAT judgments on reassessment validity, 80G exemptions, DTAA interpretation for online education (FTS/Royalty), transfer pricing methodologies, and cash deposit explanations under Section 68.
Madras High Court upholds invalidity of reassessment in CIT v. Schwing Stetter India P. Ltd., reinforcing change of opinion doctrine and assessee disclosure.
Madras High Court sets aside reassessment notice against Asianet Star Communications, citing non-existent entity and lack of new material.
Delhi High Court sets aside reassessment notices for UK Grid Solutions Ltd (GE Group), citing lack of year-specific facts and reliance on old surveys.
