Income Tax : The Income Tax Act, 2025 replaces old reassessment provisions with Sections 279 to 286 and increases reopening timelines in certai...
Income Tax : Explains how routine approvals under Section 151 can nullify reassessment proceedings. The key takeaway is that lack of applicatio...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that reassessment cannot run parallel to ongoing scrutiny proceedings. Such action was declared without jurisdiction...
Income Tax : The High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2013-14 were time-barred after computing the surviving limitation as clar...
Income Tax : A detailed look at how the Finance Act, 2021 reshaped Sections 147–151, introduced Section 148A, and reduced limitation periods ...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that reassessment notices required to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer are invalid if issued...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held reassessment orders invalid because the assessee was not supplied with the recorded reasons for reopening under Se...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court dismissed the challenge to a Delhi High Court ruling that quashed reassessment proceedings under Sections 148A(d...
Income Tax : The Telangana High Court held that reassessment proceedings initiated by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer after implementation...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC held that reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 was valid where Assessing Officer received fresh investigation materi...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
ITAT Delhi ruled reassessment invalid as the primary addition forming the basis for reopening was deleted, nullifying other additions under Sections 68 and 69.
The Rajasthan High Court invalidates a reassessment notice against Shree Cement, ruling that the notice was barred by limitation and illegally issued by the JAO.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Income Tax Department’s appeal regarding a reassessment notice, affirming that notices issued by a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer after the faceless regime was introduced are invalid.
ITAT Kolkata ruled that a reassessment is invalid if no addition is made on the original reason for reopening the case, as the foundation for the reassessment collapses.
The ITAT Delhi has quashed the reassessment against Sonia Kapoor, ruling it invalid. The court found that because no addition was made on the initial reason for reopening, the entire process was void.
The ITAT Delhi has ruled that reassessment notices issued under Section 148 after the prescribed limitation cut-off date are invalid, providing relief to the assessee.
The ITAT Chennai has quashed reassessment proceedings against Ashok Leyland Ltd., ruling the AO’s action was based on a change of opinion and not a failure by the assessee to disclose material facts.
ITAT Chennai invalidates a tax reassessment notice issued by a local officer, affirming the mandatory nature of the faceless tax regime as per judicial precedents.
The ITAT Delhi has quashed a reassessment notice, ruling it was based on borrowed satisfaction and mechanical approval from superior tax authorities.
ITAT quashes reassessment against Mauritius-based FPI, ruling that sanction from correct authority under section 151 was mandatory.
