Income Tax : The Income Tax Act, 2025 replaces old reassessment provisions with Sections 279 to 286 and increases reopening timelines in certai...
Income Tax : Explains how routine approvals under Section 151 can nullify reassessment proceedings. The key takeaway is that lack of applicatio...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that reassessment cannot run parallel to ongoing scrutiny proceedings. Such action was declared without jurisdiction...
Income Tax : The High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2013-14 were time-barred after computing the surviving limitation as clar...
Income Tax : A detailed look at how the Finance Act, 2021 reshaped Sections 147–151, introduced Section 148A, and reduced limitation periods ...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that reassessment notices required to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer are invalid if issued...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held reassessment orders invalid because the assessee was not supplied with the recorded reasons for reopening under Se...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court dismissed the challenge to a Delhi High Court ruling that quashed reassessment proceedings under Sections 148A(d...
Income Tax : The Telangana High Court held that reassessment proceedings initiated by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer after implementation...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC held that reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 was valid where Assessing Officer received fresh investigation materi...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that a company’s merger does not erase its tax liability, upholding a reassessment notice for unexamined income.
Delhi ITAT sets aside a reassessment order against Jaivir, ruling that the AO’s use of a repealed section (147(a)) shows a lack of application of mind, rendering the notice
ITAT Delhi quashes a reassessment for Sulekh Chand Jain, holding that the Rohtak Assessing Officer lacked territorial jurisdiction, making the proceedings invalid.
ITAT Raipur quashed reassessment against Christi Jain due to lack of jurisdiction; order by ITO Raipur held void as AO lacked legal authority.
ITAT Jaipur rules reassessment notice issued post-TOLA limit invalid in Sanskriti Build-Dev vs ITO. Proceedings declared time-barred under Rajeev Bansal ruling.
ITAT Chennai invalidates reassessment under Section 148 as notice issued by Jurisdictional AO post 29.03.2022 violated faceless procedure.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has invalidated the reassessment against Sunidhi Securities & Finance Limited, citing an incorrect sanctioning authority for the Section 148 notice. The case centered on a reassessment initiated for alleged bogus trading losses, which the Tribunal deemed null and void based on the judicial precedent set by the Supreme Court.
The Rajasthan High Court in Krishan Gopal Gupta vs PCIT has ruled that a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is invalid if issued by a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, reaffirming its earlier judgments on the matter.
ITAT Chennai invalidated reassessment in Pawan Cargo Forwards’ case due to notice issued by JAO, not FAO, violating the CBDT’s 2022 faceless scheme. Penny stock addition deleted.
Bombay High Court rules against the Income Tax Department, stating that a reassessment notice issued after 4 years is invalid without a clear allegation of the assessee’s failure to disclose material facts.
