Company Law : The article examines the Hamlin Trust ruling, where the NCLAT held that CFO appointments must satisfy Section 203 eligibility requ...
Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Madras HC held that a pending NCLAT appeal did not prevent PNB from conducting a Swiss Challenge auction after the OTS proposal wa...
Company Law : The NCLAT held that CFO nominees must satisfy the eligibility requirements under Section 203 of the Companies Act. It set aside th...
Income Tax : NCLAT held that a single application covering multiple years and company officers is maintainable in the absence of any statutory ...
Corporate Law : Tribunal held that proviso to Regulation 7A allows insolvency professionals to continue assignments already underway even after th...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
The NCLAT dismissed Trinity Auto Components Ltd.’s appeal seeking enforcement of benefits under the BIFR scheme. The Tribunal held that the approved resolution plan under IBC replaced the earlier rehabilitation scheme, extinguishing all prior claims. It reiterated that no dual benefits can be claimed after IBC plan approval.
NCLAT Delhi held that initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by admitting application u/s. 7 justifiable since application duly filed within 3 years of ‘Promise to Pay’ under section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
NCLAT Delhi held that mediation family settlement upheld since entire sum as per consent terms duly received. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.
NCLAT Delhi held that resolution plan of Dorni Vinimoy Pvt. Ltd. stands approved as material irregularity is not established. Accordingly, appeals are allowed and orders of adjudicating authority set aside.
NCLAT Chennai held that demand notice has been duly served on the personal guarantors and hence proceedings under section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be said to be vitiated. Accordingly, order quashed and proceedings remanded back.
NCLAT Delhi held that appellant doesn’t qualify as a Financial Creditor since appellant has failed to discharge the burden of proving any disbursement as defined under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, order upheld and appeal dismissed.
The NCLAT Delhi set aside the NCLT order admitting Athena Constructions Ltd. to CIRP, finding the Appellant was not heard on merits. While the financial creditor’s dues were settled, the NCLAT remanded the case to the NCLT to process the settlement plea and consider any claims received by the IRP.
The NCLAT Delhi dismissed an appeal by LBF Publications Private Limited, challenging an NCLT order that rejected its Section 9 IBC application. The dismissal was due to an undue and unexplained delay of 389 days in the refiling of the appeal after defects were notified by the Registry.
NCLAT ruled that a registered agreement for sale alone does not transfer ownership and affirmed that property remains part of the liquidation estate.
Citing the Supreme Court’s Jaypee Kensington judgment, the NCLAT ruled that minority creditors in a class cannot challenge a resolution plan approved by a significant majority. The appeal lacked grounds for Section 30(2) non-compliance.
