Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Vs Anish Niranjan Nanavaty & Ors. (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Vs Anish Niranjan Nanavaty & Ors. (NCLAT Delhi) NCLAT Delhi held that bank doesn’t have any jurisdiction to retain the securities [i.e. fixed deposit amount] since Corporate Debtor was not part of any facility against which any amount is due. Thus, retention on ground that there were dues against another Group Company not justified. Facts- The Corporate Debtor– Reliance Communication Infrastructure Limited opened an FDR in the Appellant Bank on 27.03.2017. On the same date a letter dated 27.03.2017 was written to the Bank by Reliance Comm...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930