Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Vs Anish Niranjan Nanavaty & Ors. (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Vs Anish Niranjan Nanavaty & Ors. (NCLAT Delhi)

NCLAT Delhi held that bank doesn’t have any jurisdiction to retain the securities [i.e. fixed deposit amount] since Corporate Debtor was not part of any facility against which any amount is due. Thus, retention on ground that there were dues against another Group Company not justified.

Facts- The Corporate Debtor– Reliance Communication Infrastructure Limited opened an FDR in the Appellant Bank on 27.03.2017. On the same date a letter dated 27.03.2017 was

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930