Case Law Details
Case Name : Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Vs Anish Niranjan Nanavaty & Ors. (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Vs Anish Niranjan Nanavaty & Ors. (NCLAT Delhi)
NCLAT Delhi held that bank doesn’t have any jurisdiction to retain the securities [i.e. fixed deposit amount] since Corporate Debtor was not part of any facility against which any amount is due. Thus, retention on ground that there were dues against another Group Company not justified.
Facts- The Corporate Debtor– Reliance Communication Infrastructure Limited opened an FDR in the Appellant Bank on 27.03.2017. On the same date a letter dated 27.03.2017 was
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

